Reply With Quote
We would ask the Celtics but they lost to the "not agrresive and not strong" Magic.
now GTFO
Lakers are 3-4 against what can be considered those legit contenders so far. They are 0-3 if you don't consider ATL and PHO contenders.
We would ask the Celtics but they lost to the "not agrresive and not strong" Magic.
now GTFO
if u count denver then you gotta count ATL and PHO.
9 pages for this crap? Suck his diiiiiiiiiiiiiiick...
Why is that? Denver was in the WCF, Atlanta and the Suns did not make it that far respectively.
LOL @ Kings. They thought they were going to steal one and Kobe said "Uh...no."
I'm pretty sure they knew they weren't going to "steal one" after Udoka missed 2 free throws and they left the #2 player in the NBA wiiiide open on the wing for a game winner..
I don't consider DEN/DAL contenders either.
Tell me more about these November/December championships?
Why are you getting defensive when I post stats? I did not say anything negative about the Lakers?
So by your logic, how can you say the Lakers are good to go in December? By their record? Tell me about the best record in December championship again please.
cuz we should be basing win -loss stats this year vs teams with records made this year. Apples to Apples.
You're the only one being defensive. Look at you.
Nice strawman.
I'll tell you about the defending champions sleep walking through the first two months of the season en route to a 26-6 record.
No. That is why I did not include the Spurs. They have a record well over .500 but I did not include them.
Win/loss is not enough. You have to draw the line somewhere. It is widely considered that ORL, BOS, LA, DAL, DEN and CLE are contenders. Not PHO and ATL.
dallas? u only addong them in ur stats cuz they beat the lakers
Me doing stat work and you saying "tell me about the December championships" equals me being defensive? You said nothing pertaining to my stat work.
They are not sleepwalking. They are losing to contenders and beating up non contenders. Not really even beating them up, just beating them at the buzzer. Cavs had the best record last year. Tell me about regular season championships again.
No. I provided all the stats. With and without ATL and Suns in my OP. So don't pull that card. The Suns just absolutely trounced the Lakers as well. It is just widely considered they are not legit contenders. Dallas is.
Even if you add them in along with Atlanta, which I already did, the lakers are 3-4. That is a losing record.
Hey Laker fans
get a clue.
Most every single non-laker fan does not agree with you.
Get a friggin clue and talk about something else already.
Posting meaningless win/loss record from Dec/Nov is not 'stat work'.
Again, Den/Dal are not contenders. And that's the definition of sleepwalking btw. Last year the Lakers came out having to prove themselves all over again after their disastrous finals. This year? The urgency won't be there until late Feb - just like every other Phil Jackson team looking to repeat. Of course repeating is foreign concept to Spurs fan.
The Cavs aren't the Lakers.
That's a fact. Another Fact is Dallas >>>>>>> San Antonio. Therefore San Antonio is nowhere near a contender.
Nobody in the West is a contender except for LA and thats not even debatable. The race for 2nd in the West is wide open. I think its so funny that Spur Fan cheers for their team with their eyes closed and think they have a decent shot at winning at all.
Atleast I can admit that my team has no chance against LA.
SpurFan just digs for excuses instead of straight up admitting their team sucks balls
Agreed.
21_Bas s trying to talk again.
This tells me that you have no right to even call yourself a fan at all if you can't believe in your team.
Yea, I actually just skip over all of his posts now. They all are always something like "Lakers are the greatest and every other team is playing for second." It gets pretty old.
I'm sorry that you're having trouble accepting reality. The 2nd best team of the decade is nothing to sneeze at. You should be proud of your Spurs.
No, I'm not the least bit surprised that golden boy got away with a blatant push-off and subsequently freed himself up for the game winner. Just add it to the list...that's three games recently that the Lakers had handed to them on an egregious no-call late. Bucks: blatant Bryant offensive foul at a critical time of the game; no-call, Kings: Gasol blatantly shoves Thompson to the ground and tips in the game tying basket; no-call.
Lakers fans are either delusional or in denial if they think these wins are positive. They're only positive in the sense that they keep the Lakers atop the race for the best record in the league, but overall, they're an indicator of how overrated this team is. An absolutely awful bench, terrible point guard play, a should be All-Star center who's underutilized because he's playing with the most selfish player in the league and a leading player with a ton of mileage on his body, supposedly banged up, playing major minutes nightly and desperately trying to win a scoring le. Shockingly, despite their talent, this is a middle of the road offensive team and they're slipping by the game defensively. As a Spurs fan, I like everything that's going on with the Lakers right now.
Son, even nba.com says the Spurs are the best team of the decade. Almost everyone had the Spurs as the best team of the decade. However, there are many Laker fans like 21_Bas s, _your_mother Buddy, namicantsee, thinking that the Lakers are team of the decade.I'm sorry that you're having trouble accepting reality. The 2nd best team of the decade is nothing to sneeze at. You should be proud of your Spurs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions