no.
no.
why would you suggest a photographer doesn't do anything at all, but that it's the camera?
85% of my work my website was done with a crappy 10 year old $200 camera. that kind of voids your argument.
she doesn't care, no. she was actually disappointed that i didn't use them up on my website.
EDIT: she was disappointed i didn't use the one where she was running up on my website.
and considering she works at a hooters, i'm pretty sure she's used to getting a bunch of crap from real life perverts.
so Pego,
Tim Duncan's not good at basketball. The basketball is just good at going in the rim without his help. Or the astronomer's telescope labels stars and explains their formation and contents, not the scientist.
And seriously bro, a chick who's clearly posing for photographs probably doesn't mind people seeing said pics of her... she probably knows that's going to happen, or she wouldn't be posing in the first place.
you don't have to do nothing, you have to point and click.
and what does the price of the camera have to do with anything? the pictures are all photoshopped.
you tell me.Taking pictures is easy, a baby could do it. The only reason one persons' pictures look better than anothers' is because they have more expensive equipment.
what do you do for a living, pego?
thispego you're so ignorant it's hilarious!
i do however love that avatar because well dumb n dumber is my favorite movie... you could be casted in dumb n dumber 3 if there ever was one to be made.
haha you are a moron, you picked probably his dumbest analogy to make your point.so Pego,
Tim Duncan's not good at basketball. The basketball is just good at going in the rim without his help. Or the astronomer's telescope labels stars and explains their formation and contents, not the scientist.
And seriously bro, a chick who's clearly posing for photographs probably doesn't mind people seeing said pics of her... she probably knows that's going to happen, or she wouldn't be posing in the first place.
a basketball is not a machine that does all the work for you. any idiot can pick up a camera and take a picture and develop it or look into a telescope and record what they see.
and you are one of the biggest pervs on here, you were probably the first to rub one out over that poor unassuming girl.
Your point. I'm glad you see how stupid it is.
anything i want. admittedly i'm not in my dream career yet, but everyone has to pay their dues unless their nice things in life are just handed to them.
never have i had a point that was stupid.
the camera doesn't do all the work for you!
i'll tell you what. how about we shoot the same camera, and process on the same computer.
we'll see who's picture comes out better.
i aint ignant, i know everything
seriosuly, though, i'm right.
sure, i'd love to prove my point
you still haven't said anything about the fact that 85% of my pictures on my website were taken with a $200 camera.
yeah i did, i said all the pictures were photoshopped so your finished product was not what you developed from your $200 camera
lol. alright, you win.
you could have just said my website sucked and saved ourselves the trouble.
i never said your website sucked
i know, i know. but you could have said my work sucked or something.
i suppose you gave me your honest opinion, and that's what i asked for.
that it's a bit naive, well...
i never actually commented on YOUR work, just the work of photographers in general. I mean, my honest opinion of your work is that they are pictures, just look like regular pictures you would see in a magazine or yearbook or something. I dont think they're GREAT i don't think they're HORRIBLE. They're pictures, how great or horrible could they be? I think all these people could have taken portraits themseves but, hey, i guess that's why they hire you, you have the equipment and it's probably easier than going out to rent your own.
Having done some photography and TONS of Photoshop touch-ups and alterations...I will say that it DOES take someone who knows a little something about posing...setting up the shot...frame of reference...and an overall good knowledge of context to pull off a great photograph...however...even a bad shot can almost always be saved by my friend...Photoshop...
I'm a fan of your work and I think your new website is a great start considering you just found code over the internet and put it all together to come up with it.
My opinions on the site: I don't particularly like the effect you used for your portfolio section - it makes me dizzy. I also feel it doesn't showcases your work very well. Thumbnails are almost always a good idea. I think once you figure out what you want to do with your site, more content should be added. Also, I cringed a little when I saw the font you used for your logo. Just my very humble opinion, of course.
Good start, though.
thanks!
i appreciate your opinion, as humble as you think it is!
maybe i should slow down the scroll? the problem with that is that it is slow on the way back, as well.
i wish i were better with code...or that i had a spare $5000 around to purchase the site that i eventually want to upgrade to. lol.
and by content do you mean more photos?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
