Some people call for others to declare their sexual orientation. Others do not.
Thank you for sharing. Now I "care". I'm sure some bag will try to convince me that I care now.![]()
You say I think everyone would be interested. No I didn't. I sure some a-hole will try to tell me I did.
"Dont project your interests onto others"This is a public forum. Thats what some people do here.
You ers amuse me.
Some people call for others to declare their sexual orientation. Others do not.
jack is an odd cruiser.
So why did you ask in the first place?
Aside from your personal interest and curiosity, of course.
check out the expression of your smiley, jack.
Scratch me off your list of posters who want to know jackie..I mean jack
Found it amusing that the answer to this question was yes.
Last edited by Winehole23; 01-10-2010 at 04:44 AM.
At some point conscription will have to be revisited, as the war on terror amplifies. All-volunteer makes the rest of us free riders in the war.Fact is, we cannot, are unwilling/unable, or cannot politically sustain the level of security required for civil society to thrive in Iraq or Afghanistan. The all-volunteer character of the military practically insures that we can't, and the political will to alter this limitation does not exist.
i thought this was about jean paul sartre, existentialism or absurdist theater
Perhaps that's how this thing finally ends.
At least once upon a time the plutocrats actually believed in seeing their own flesh and blood serve and die for the state, instead of seeing their progeny send the children of the poor and working class to die on the battlefield. Or, Bush41 could actually initiate a war with some understanding of what it was like to be shot at, escape death, and see other Americans die while to Clinton, Bush43, and Obama it's something the generals tell them about via PowerPoint.
Gotta draw the line somewhere. Requiring citizens to do military service might be that place.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)