Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,850
    The military budget is the price we pay for the nation’s foreign policy. The U.S. currently is spending nearly as much as the rest of the world. In real terms, Washington is spending more today than at any time during the Cold War, the Korean War, or the Vietnam War.
    Using 2000 for constant dollars, the U.S. devoted $774.6 billion to the military in 1945, the last year of World War II. In 1953, the last year of the Korean War, military outlays ran $416.1 billion. Peak expenditures during the Vietnam War hit $421.3 billion in 1968.
    Expenditures as a percentage of GDP have fallen because the U.S. economy has grown, not because military outlays have dropped.
    U.S. outlays per capita dramatically outpace those of other nations. My Cato Ins ute colleague Chris Preble figures that in 2010 citizens in America will devote more than five times as much as Germans, about eight times as much as Japanese, and more than 27 times as much as Chinese.
    America possesses the most sophisticated nuclear arsenal and most powerful conventional force. Washington’s ability to intervene is unparalleled: the U.S. possesses 11 carrier groups. Russia has one. India has one. There are no others.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Military budget is corporate socialism, like so much of the federal budget that tea partiers NEVER even mention while going after Magic Negro for doing the same spending that Repugs do.

    Read an article a few weeks ago where an IG said the military had almost no financial controls, auditing, doesn't know or care where the money goes. They know they'll get their $600B and a gold-plated existence year in and year out.

    Any politician trying to rein in military waste is intimidated and destroyed as "weak on national security" by Repug and neo-c*nt death-mongers and MIC lackeys, many of whom are of course revolving-door, double-dipping Generals and Admirals.

    The entire military expense area is just another area where corps compromise/buy the govt, suck the wealth out taxpayers and run up huge federal deficits.

    $700B ain't about the bald-faced lie of "supporting the troops", it's all about supporting/subsidizing the MIC.

  4. #4
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Get rid of the government programs not addressed by the cons ution before talking about reducing the military spending. It is addressed in the cons ution.
    Last edited by Wild Cobra; 01-13-2010 at 05:26 PM.

  5. #5
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    A blurb in the Cons ution does not justify the American Empire.

  6. #6
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    A blurb in the Cons ution does not justify the American Empire.
    Agreed.

    We need to stop allowing the Washington Elitist from the control of the public, with tax dollars.

    They are our servants, but they seem to thing they can do what ever they want.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "they seem to thing they can do what ever they want."

    Not "seem", they do whatever the corporations and capitalists pay them to do.

  8. #8
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    "they seem to thing they can do what ever they want."

    Not "seem", they do whatever the corporations and capitalists pay them to do.
    My God.

    Are you really that dumb?

    They have their banker, insurance, and lawyer friends. Most other businesses will suffer if they get their way. They have bough the vote of poor people, and the more poor people they make, the poorer a person is, the more inticing it is to vote democrat!

    They are seemingly, intentionally, destroying the wealth of this nation.

    Poor people should have the motivation to become rich. Not want to tear down the rick, but whi instigates class envy?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •