Look ll...bust out the records and show the math. Don't give us conjecture, give us concrete proof.
Incidentally, Tim Duncan is the only player in NBA history to win multiple les in which the entire basketball team roster had changed. Tim's the only constant.
Kobe hasn't done that and as long as turnstile Fisher is active, he won't get to.
Look ll...bust out the records and show the math. Don't give us conjecture, give us concrete proof.
Who else besides Pau cons utes "the rebuild"?
Oh and you realize...caring means they were not bored...but I digress.
Total wins does not equal winning %. If team x has 50 more wins than team y but also has 100 more games total, how can you say team x is more consistent?
1999 and 2005 or 2007 genius.
Players that played?
Malik Rose was on both teams. Not sure why it matters when the only person who was on the 1999 le team as well as the 2005 le was Tim Duncan.
Who cares? We all know the Lakers have had, do have, and will continue to have better players than the Spurs
Marc had never played for the Lakers. If anything that's the opposite of "rebuilding" since you gave up a young talent for an older one.
The 05 and 07 rosters had not one player besides Tim Duncan from the 99 squad.
Therefore: Multiple les after a the roster of a previous le team changed completely.
Is English your second language? I may mess up Sporting News awards but you thoroughly mangle the intent and meaning of the English language.
No, you're just an illiterate .
The 99 roster was completely different from 05, 07 rosters besides Tim Duncan.
No...not at all, just calling a spade, a punk spade
You realize that you just got punked and now you're trying misdirection in an attempt to throw me off.
YAWN...
I grow tired of toying with LAL fan when it comes to talking hoops. Them beating me in a solid basketball debate amounts to a fight between a MIB Hammer and a LAL bandwagon Nail.
Hey...the hammer wins every time.
It's amazing that a team that first started in the NBA in 1976 could have such an awesome winning percentage, nay, the best winning percentage in all of basketball since Tim Duncan became a Spur. His win-loss record is better than Kobe's...REALITY.
Explain to me how Kobe's 1 regular season MVP (his lifetime achievement award) to TD's 2, his 1 Finals MVPs to TD's 3, his placing on the all-time worst Finals performances to TD's 4 on the top 50, a higher regular season and post-season PER, and more overall NBA squads cons utes Kobe having a better career?
Oh right, he scored 81 points. Funny thing is David Robinson's 71 point game was more impressive. At least his was a double-double.
Stats are stubborn things to Laker fans.
Oh and can you qualify your assertion ass-wipe?
Is it MVPs? KBB has 1 less.
Is it Rookie of the year? Kobe doesn't have 1.
Is it All-NBA teams? Tim's done it his entire career, while Kobe has NOT.
Is it All-NBA Defense teams? Again, Tim's done it his entire career, while Kobe has not.
Is it championships?They're equal but they're not, you see Tim has 3 Finals MVP to KBB's 1.
SO...where is it that Kobe still has the better career?
You need to learn more hoops wanna-be. Your game is about as strong as Sasha Vujacic and we all realize...that's not a good thing.![]()
Even if we take away the reg. season MVPs, Duncan's career is still better.
Higher overall PER in both reg. and post-season: Meaningless.
More Finals MVPs: Meaningless.
Overall a much, much better statistical performer in the Finals: Meaningless.
More all-NBA first teams: Meaningless.
81 points and the ability to volume shoot? These define a great career.
Man...you're totally getting your ass kicked. Who lead's the West in votes for the All-Star game?
If that ain't popularity, that I don't know what is. Reality...how could he win NBA MVP when for the greater part of his career, he wasn't even the best player on his own damn team? He was so pissed off at his inability to become option #1 that he had to change his jersey number in an attempt to start anew.
No matter how you try to Kobe-ize your views, it don't in' matter. Real basketball fans know the real deal and know which player has had the better career. He didn't need to change his number either.
Still waiting for the 80% math there LL. You lag, do you need to bust out your Algebra book?
The first NBA great after all those other times. Oh wait! They only started sending NBA players in 1992. So there had been 3 whole teams before 2004. Why didn't Kobe play on that 2004 team?
I see you don't understand the concept...I am not surprised.
I don't have to edit . You have just been schooled.
Reach a little more, maybe you'll get an injury that's actually legit unlike your hero.
You have NOTHING. Stats don't help you, awards, accolades, the performances themselves, nothing.
Leave it to an LA to think "adding excitement to the game" is a valid "accomplishment" in a player's legacy. Or maybe you crave it being the only exciting thing to come of out Cerritos was those car commercials starring Ernest.
Excitement...Guess Pistol Pete is a top ten player of all-time.
Now get off the board and go watch the Hills
Nah this is more akin to a 20 point blowout.
Still with the misdirection...show us the math ass-wipe.
You realize that every assertion you made, has been re-buffed with relative ease?
Probably not...but that's what makes these responses fun.
See...The Hammer wins every time.
Sure do. And in the end, even if no one remembers Duncan (hilarious concept), the only thing people will remember Kobe for is asking if he could bust a nut on a white chicks face.
I think it may be time to return to beneath your bridge in Cerritos and find some new material.
You were fun while you lasted but now you're just chucking it, hoping for whatever hits. Kinda like a Kobe shooting night.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)