A Basketball Bet That Would Make An Honest Man Out Of You

[WalterSobchak]

We don't have to go back that far. We dominated you during a decade when you had the best two players of the history of your franchise.

You do realize a decade is 10 years right? Not 6 years. Spurs had Duncan & Robinson (the 2 best players in the Spurs History as you put it) from 97-03. In in that 6 years, the playoffs results were 2-2. Hardly domination. But leave it to a Lakers fan to his own argument up. ing Nihilist.

[midnightpulp]

You do realize a decade is 10 years right? Not 6 years. Spurs had Duncan & Robinson (the 2 best players in the Spurs History as you put it) from 97-03. In in that 6 years, the playoffs results were 2-2. Hardly domination. But leave it to a Lakers fan to his own argument up. ing Nihilist.

3-2 if you count 94-95 when the Admiral put the beat-down on Elden Campbell, Eddie Jones, etc, etc. Players Luva has never heard of.

In those days, he was waiting for MJ to come back.

[WalterSobchak]

You Spurfans specialize in being clowns. Did Robinson and Duncan play together last decade? However you want to look at it, we bullied those es.

Do you need a lesson in grammar? During A decade is a major difference than during the LAST decade.

[midnightpulp]

You clowns are amazing with this whole decade . Only from idiot Spursfans. The decade starting in 2000 and ended new years of 2010. And why do you continue to mention these scrub players that never should been on my team to begin with

I applaud you for finally making a specific definition and from 2000-10, the Lakers have dominated the Spurs.

I'm okay with that, however. les are all that matter and I'll take 3 in the decade anytime, no matter which team does or doesn't have a winning record against the Spurs. All matchups are cyclical. The Suns have slapped you guys around this decade, but since you have 4 les, do you really care?

[Man In Black]

Hey what is any 10-year period called?

Any...

Seriously.

You can't possibly be this dense, but lo and behold, all we have to do is read what you post, and then it's incredibly clear that you are

[mystargtr34]

Comparing Duncan to Kobe is like comparing English to MJ.

Efficiency.

[Man In Black]

LAL FANS: Zero
Spurs Fans: Dominant

[admiralsnackbar]

I'm going to share something with you about winning. I know you are new to this concept and will probably never truly understand, but your 2003 le came from us being bored with winning so easily. This happens to all the great teams, of which Duncan has never played on by the way. On average, we visit the le game every other year since the existence of our glorious franchise. Believe or not, we just get bored with winning, it happens in everything that comes so easy. Pussy, money, food, you name it. You can get bored with it when it comes so easily for you. Not saying that you would even understand a word of this knowledge, but I'm just saying...

Is that why Kobe and Fish cried, imbecile?

[F_U_Buddy]

80%?

Let's take a look shall we!

2009/2010 : 30-9; 30/39 = .769 = 77% Oh so close
2008/2009 : 65-17; 65/82 = .79 = 79% Getting warmer!
2007/2008 : 57-25; 57/82 = .69 = 69% Damn yer goin the wrong way!
2006/2007 : 42-20; 42/82 = .51 = 51%

PS: I don't give a what the Lakers do in the regular season. Just like you don't give a what the Spurs do in the regular season.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...ght=spurs+lead

Whoops!

LOL 105-85

Hey you soft nipple head there's always +/- % to deal with but since this isn't George Bush fuzzy math or Karl Rovian politics then we'll just have to round off to the nearest ten % which for the last 2 years puts us at an 80% clip...So like lakaluva said...right it down ...overall throughout history an ~62% winning clip making us the most successful team NBA history...


When going head to head, in five different playoff series ('01, '02, '03, '04, '08). Lakers won four of ive, and if you break it down by games, the Lakers won 18 and the Spurs eight. If you're judging by "overall winning percentage, playoff appearances and championships," the Lakers win two out of three we blow the Spurs away in direct compe ion in the decade in which we're debating.

[Shastafarian]

Hey you soft nipple head

That's a new one. Why you all up on my nuts? Oh cuz I made you feel more insecure. I had forgotten

there's always +/- % to deal with but since this isn't George Bush fuzzy math or Karl Rovian politics then we'll just have to round off to the nearest ten %

Um...what?

which for the last 2 years puts us at an 80% clip

So you didn't mean "ten %"

...So like lakaluva said...right it down ...

He said last 3 years. If you wanna count this year, which isn't even over yet, fine but that third year is the real at 69%.

overall throughout history an ~62% winning clip making us the most successful team NBA history...

With the Spurs at 60%.

When going head to head, in five different playoff series ('01, '02, '03, '04, '08). Lakers won four of ive, and if you break it down by games, the Lakers won 18 and the Spurs eight. If you're judging by "overall winning percentage, playoff appearances and championships," the Lakers win two out of three we blow the Spurs away in direct compe ion in the decade in which we're debating.

I enjoy how you left out '99 when the Spurs shut down the Forum.

[F_U_Buddy]

That's a new one. Why you all up on my nuts? Oh cuz I made you feel more insecure. I had forgotten
Um...what?
So you didn't mean "ten %"
He said last 3 years. If you wanna count this year, which isn't even over yet, fine but that third year is the real at 69%.
With the Spurs at 60%.


I enjoy how you left out '99 when the Spurs shut down the Forum.

The half a season that no one really prepared for...sure I will give that to you but it doesn't really change things we own you s...and my math is dam straight....head to head and for the near and long term future...we'll be ing the out of the Spurs....and any "incidental" regular season losses we may give to you guys well let's just chalk it up to too much Laker ing...sometimes we just need a good blowjob so we allow you to indulge yourselves....

[Findog]

Congratulations on getting this thread to 7 pages.

[WalterSobchak]

The half a season that no one really prepared for...sure I will give that to you but it doesn't really change things we own you s...and my math is dam straight....head to head and for the near and long term future...we'll be ing the out of the Spurs....and any "incidental" regular season losses we may give to you guys well let's just chalk it up to too much Laker ing...sometimes we just need a good blowjob so we allow you to indulge yourselves....

Above quote translation: "Whaaa! I can't accept the fact that my Lakers got ed into submission on Tuesday night. We were supposed to be able to challenge the 72-10 record of the Bulls. But I now know we won't even finish with as many wins as last season. Let alone the thoughts of even sniffing a chance to win the Finals again. Whaaaa!"

ing Nihilist.

[Findog]

I am a felcher.

[Man In Black]

It's the next day...and I see they still haven't figured out basic math.
TYPICAL of Phil Jockstrap led LAL fans.

[LkrFan]

Nah this is more akin to a 20 point blowout.

Sp*rs beat us without Gasol and a hurt Kobe. Then y'all let Gasol's younger brother punk y'all in Memphis. (You know, the player that was so much worst than his big brother that was essentially a "throw in" during the Pau heist.)

No team has beaten us twice this year. We're 3-0 against teams that beat us. (Ask Dallas - who beat y'all. We whooped them by 35. Then we beat them in their building).

Sig bet: IF* both teams are healthy in the playoffs, I bet you the Lakers win. Not only that, you guys won't win more than 2 games. Deal?

*IF y'all get by Dallas or the Nuggets that is.

[LkrFan]

You do realize a decade is 10 years right? Not 6 years. Spurs had Duncan & Robinson (the 2 best players in the Spurs History as you put it) from 97-03. In in that 6 years, the playoffs results were 2-2. Hardly domination. But leave it to a Lakers fan to his own argument up. ing Nihilist.

Hey, don't I remember you from LakersGround? Now you are a Sp*rs fan?

[WalterSobchak]

Hey, don't I remember you from LakersGround? Now you are a Sp*rs fan?

Actually I troll on Lakers Ground under a different user name.