Reply With Quote
Posey has always been dirty..nothing new.
-K
I didn't think you would take it this far.
Spurs simply attacked more. It was that simple on the free throw count. Hornets were lazy on defense too.
Posey has always been dirty..nothing new.
-K
BR loves complaining about the refs. Now you know what it is like to have a superstar that does not get superstar calls. You should love the Spurs, not hate them.
She must.
I remember i posted a thread on how everyone was too busy sucking off King James that they were suffocating from his smegma fumes, and i was warned that i would be banned.
lolerz
For sure, but the good kind of dirty.
Look it ain't no different for the Spurs. We've been on the short end of the calls and we have no one to blame but ourselves and our lack of aggression. This game it just so happens the Hornets were the team who had no fire. It happens to every team. So you lost because the calls were lopsided. So what? The root of your problem remains your team's lack of aggression.
oh wow really son? are you watching me or something? I saw the entire game and the Hornets were slow in the first half no doubt ... BUT like I said above. I don't give a damn if the 95 Chicago Bulls were playing ... when one team is given THREE TIMES as many free throws as the other, I don't care who you are you're not going to win.
There were some bad calls on both sides..
I didn't watch the 1st half, so I can't comment..
Duncan's "jump-ball" call was questionable, but I thought it was the right call since I don't remember the ball coming out of the other dude's hands..either way, NO got the ball back..
There was a bad call where Devin Brown lost control of the ball and threw it out of bounds, but they called it off Hill..
I don't remember any other glaring calls..
bull
son you can't honestly believe that ... 38 free throws compared to 12. no excuse for that at all. blatant favoritism from the refs.
Three times the fouls equals three times the aggression.
son I also said in the post to take your homer glasses off. I will say please this time.
great job, slovenac.
Generally I think you have some nice comments, but right now you are in denial and you are starting to whine. Let it go and start ing about your team's lack of aggression. In the end you will feel much better facing reality.
haha paul fouled out. how often does this happen?
Spurs won cuz they didnt have RJ!
son I have already said that the Hornets started the game like . HOWEVER, they played well in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarter. YOU need to realize that your team got all the calls today and that is the ONLY ... THE ONLY ... reason they won. 38 free throws compared to 12 ... come on dude you know its true.
So you admit to ing....
son the Spurs have more blacks on their team and its MLK day ... we didn't stand a chance. the script was already written by the NBA/WWE. its one of those "feel good" stories ya know?
son everyone es but at least my post are full of class and dignity. god bless
So using words like " z" doesn't cross the line of decency but if someone merely points out a couple of badly missed calls by a black ref against white players Manu and Matt Bonner they are branded a racist. Nice standards we have here.
The Spurs were the more aggressive team...for once. While the Hornets were jacking up jumpers basically the whole the game, the Spurs....from TP to Manu to Hill to TD to Blair...were all taking it to the rack. Usually the more aggressive team gets the calls...son.
oh please! son we only lost by 7 points despite the fact that you guys were handed 26 more free throws on a silver platter.
No doubt we won the game because we shot more foul shots. No doubt we shot more foul shots because we were more aggressive and the Hornets were busy laying eggs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
