Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Veteran Spursmania's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    8,104
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the...l?wprss=thefix

    Arkansas Rep. Marion Berry to retire

    Arkansas Rep. Marion Berry is expected to announce his retirement tomorrow morning, according to three sources briefed on the decision.
    Berry will become the sixth Democrat in a compe ive seat to leave in the last two months but the first to announce his retirement since the party's special election loss in Massachusetts last Tuesday.

    "The message coming out of the Massachusetts special election is clear: No Democrat is safe," said National Republican Congressional Committee communications director Ken Spain.

    Berry, first elected in 1996, had been noncommittal about his re-election bid for months although, privately, his allies insisted he was planning to run for re-election.

    While Berry had rarely been challenged in the 1st district over the past decade or so, the seat has a clear Republican tilt as Arizona Sen. John McCain (R) won it with 59 percent in 2008.
    Arkansas will be a huge focus of Republican efforts in the fall with Berry and Rep. Vic Snyder (D) retiring and Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D) in deep trouble as she seek re-election.

    The field to replace Berry isn't yet set although Democrats mentioned include state Rep. Keith Ingram, Berry chief of staff Chad Causey and Jason Willett, a former state party chair. State Attorney General Dustin McDaniel (D) is regarded as a rising star in the state and would be a favorite if he ran. On the Republican side, broadcaster Rick Crawford is in the race although the field is likely to expand with the Berry announcement.

    Berry joins Snyder as well as Reps. Dennis Moore (Kans.), John Tanner (Tenn.), Brian Baird (Wash.) and Bart Gordon (Tenn.) as Members sitting in districts either won by McCain or carried narrowly by President Obama to step aside between the end of November and today.

    Democratic strategists warned privately that a Coakley loss could open the floodgates for members who were wavering about their future political plans. Including Berry, there are now 12 Democratic members retiring with 14 Republicans calling it quits.

    The next two weeks could well serve as a tipping point in the battle for House control. Today there appear to be too few open Democratic seats for Republican to win the 40 seats they need to take control. But, another handful of retirements in swing districts could imperil Democrats hold on the chamber.

  2. #2
    Veteran Spursmania's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    8,104
    By ADAM NAGOURNEY and CARL HULSE Published: January 24, 2010
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/25/us...s/25elect.html

    G.O.P. Seeks to Widen Field of Play in Fall Elections


    WASHINGTON — Republicans are luring new candidates into House and Senate races, and the number of seats up for grabs in November appears to be growing, setting up a midterm election likely to be harder fought than anyone anticipated before the party’s big victory in Massachusetts last week.

    Republicans still face many obstacles, not least a number of potentially divisive primaries in coming months that will highlight the deep ideological rifts within the party. But in the days since Republicans claimed the Senate seat that Edward M. Kennedy had held for decades, upending assumptions in both parties about the political landscape for 2010, they have seen not just a jolt of energy and optimism but also more concrete opportunities to take on Democrats.

    Just since Tuesday, half a dozen Republicans have expressed interest in challenging Democrats in House races in New York, Pennsylvania and potentially Massachusetts, party officials said.

    “I think it was inspiring and gave voice to a lot of people,” said Mike Fitzpatrick, a former one-term Republican congressman from the Philadelphia suburbs who announced on Saturday that he would try to reclaim his old seat from Representative Patrick J. Murphy, a Democrat.

    Representative John Boozman, Republican of Arkansas, said the results in Massachusetts had pushed him toward challenging Senator Blanche Lincoln, a vulnerable Democrat. “If the people of Massachusetts are upset, you can imagine how the people of Arkansas feel,” Mr. Boozman said in a telephone interview Sunday night.

    Republicans said they were soliciting high-profile candidates for Senate races in Indiana and Wisconsin, states they had been prepared to write off just weeks ago. Tommy G. Thompson, the former Wisconsin governor, is considering challenging Senator Russ Feingold, a Democrat, aides said. Even in longer-shot states like New York, Republicans said they think the political climate gives them a chance to find a strong Senate candidate.

    “If you live in a district with no Republican candidate, run for office,” Representative Pete Sessions of Texas, chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, wrote in a posting on RedState, a conservative blog.

    Stuart Rothenberg, a political analyst who follows Congressional races, said a report he will release Monday will count 58 Democratic House seats in play, up from 47 in December. The number of Republican seats in play has held at 14 in that period, he said. And Democrats expect more of their in bents to retire, which could put additional seats at risk.

    Democratic officials said Sunday night that Representative Marion Berry of Arkansas was expected to announce plans to retire Monday, making him the first to quit since the Massachusetts election and opening up another compe ive race.

    Republicans need a net gain of 40 seats to regain control of the House. That still seems unlikely, though hardly impossible.

    Mr. Rothenberg lists seven Democratic Senate seats and four Republican seats in play; that number will not change on Monday, though Mr. Rothenberg recently rated Republicans as likely to take over Mrs. Lincoln’s seat in Arkansas.

    “The Republicans are expanding the playing field, no doubt about that,” Mr. Rothenberg said, describing it as a continuing Democratic deterioration that began late last summer.

    But the outlook for November remains hard to discern for several reasons. The Supreme Court decision last week overturning limits on corporate money in campaigns could alter races in ways difficult to predict, though the conventional wisdom is that Republicans will benefit most.

    President Obama and the Democrats are reorganizing to blunt any advantage Republicans might have gained from the burst of angry populism that seems to be coursing through both parties.

    The White House has not given up on passing a health care bill, and there is still time for the economy to improve in a way that could benefit the president and his party. And while Republicans are benefiting now from a wave of optimism, they also face a thicket of primary fights, starting in Illinois on Feb. 2, which could weaken their nominees.

    Democrats have not been spared primary battling. Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who switched to the Democratic Party from the Republican last year, faces a primary challenge on the left from Representative Joe Sestak. The party also faces compe ive Senate primaries in Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, North Carolina and Ohio, reflecting, among other issues, strains between liberals and centrists.

    But the deeper intramural divisions are within the Republican Party, a sign of the intensity and unpredictability of the grass-roots conservative movement.

    Across the country, Republican candidates are running as outsiders with the backing of conservative Tea Party groups, challenging Republicans identified with the party establishment. Several analysts said the victory in the Massachusetts Senate race of Scott Brown, a Republican who ran with Tea Party support, could encourage more challenges and drive in bents further right.

    Senator John McCain of Arizona, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, is facing a primary challenge from former Representative J. D. Hayworth, who is seeking to exploit longstanding unease among conservatives toward Mr. McCain.

    Highly contested and potentially divisive Senate primaries are also shaping up in California, Colorado, Florida, Kentucky, Nevada and New Hampshire.
    The Illinois primary next week is one example where a Senate candidate favored by the Republican establishment, Representative Mark Steven Kirk, has to deal with the complications of a challenge from the right. Mr. Kirk has veered right on issues like climate change, after originally voting for a Democratic bill on the subject in the House.

    In Kentucky, Trey Grayson, the secretary of state, faces a stiff challenge from Dr. Rand Paul, a Tea Party candidate and a son of Representative Ron Paul of Texas, a Republican presidential candidate in 2008. If Mr. Paul wins — and early polling suggests he could — a Democrat would be favored to win the seat, now held by Jim Bunning, a Republican who is not seeking re-election.

    The debate over whether the party needs to embrace conservative roots or broaden its appeal will continue this week in Honolulu, where the Republican National Committee is girding to address a so-called purity resolution introduced by conservative leaders. The resolution requires Republican candidates to support at least 8 of 10 conservative positions — on issues including abortion, same-sex marriage and immigration — or be cut off from party financing and support.

    Party officials said they were hopeful that they could head off the resolution, though probably not without a contentious debate.
    Republicans said that the glut of candidates was evidence of the party’s robustness, and that primaries were as likely to be helpful as damaging to the party’s hopes in November.

    “There’s a ton of primaries on the Republican side,” said Curt Anderson, a senior adviser to Michael Steele, the chairman of the Republican National Committee. “I have always been of the camp that that’s a healthy thing. I know Democrats say: ‘They are divided. They have primaries.’ I’m like, throw me in the briar patch — we have people who want to run for office.”
    Democrats have seized on this as evidence of the obstacles Republicans face. Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said that by his count, Republicans face robust primaries in at least 55 districts. “The dynamic is to drive the winner way to the right,” Mr. Van Hollen said, “which does risk losing the moderate and independent vote.”

    Charlie Cook, an analyst of Congressional races, said these contested primaries could prove to be a plus for Republicans, in the form of increased contributions, volunteers and votes. But, Mr. Cook said, “If it helps eccentric candidates who are not electable in a general election get the nomination, that’s a problem, or if Tea Party candidates lose primaries and Tea Party supporters stay home, that’s a problem.”
    Jeff Zeleny contributed reporting.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    2,617
    But, Mr. Cook said, “If it helps eccentric candidates who are not electable in a general election get the nomination, that’s a problem"
    GOP insider's fear a resurgent conservative movement as much as leftists do.

    Methinks there wouldn't be one founding father who wouldn't be viewed as an extreme "eccentric" conservative radical and "not electable" by most of these idiots.

  4. #4
    "Have to check the film" PixelPusher's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,396
    Methinks there wouldn't be one founding father who wouldn't be viewed as an extreme "eccentric" conservative radical and "not electable" by most of these idiots.
    Setting aside the fact that their owning slaves probably wouldn't poll well with the vast majority of the American electorate today, I think a lot of Founding Fathers would indeed be considered radical and un-electable - by conservatives.

    Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.

    --------

    Over grown military establishments are under any form of government inau ious to liberty, and are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty.
    "Isolationist!"
    Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear.
    "Athiest!"
    I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country.
    "Marxist!"
    All wars are follies, very expensive and very mischievous ones.

    Do good to your friends to keep them, to your enemies to win them.
    "Hippie!"
    And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion and Government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.

    Each generation should be made to bear the burden of its own wars, instead of carrying them on, at the expense of other generations.

    I should not regret a fair and full trial of the entire abolition of capital punishment.

    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.

    In no instance have... the churches been guardians of the liberties of the people.

    It is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or pretended, from abroad.
    "...you've got to be ing kidding me! That's gotta be Dennis Kucinich in a wig, right?"

    ------------------------

    Of course it's pretty ing stupid to set in stone the values and philosophies of 18th Century landed gentry with (at the time) radical views based on "newfangled" Enlightenment notions of liberty and reason, who lived in an agrarian culture just taking it's first steps in to the Industrial Revolution. Even more ing stupid is your applying modern ideological labels to their views, since they fail to fit into a neat, coherent box of Conservative, Liberal or even Libertarian values. If these men were alive today, they would absorb all the knowledge, science, culture, philosphy and history of the last 200 years and amend their views accordingly.

    But of course this is assuming you and the rest of the Fox News conservobots actually had any genuine interest in understanding the context that these real life, amazing, yet fallible human beings existed in, instead of deifying them as marble mascots for your Team America pep rally.

    ...which reminds me - one last quote for you:
    Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.
    Last edited by PixelPusher; 01-25-2010 at 04:19 AM.

  5. #5
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Awesome post, PixelPusher. The length dittohead and FoxNews conservatives (fascists?) go to to wrap themselves and their views in the flag is pathetic.

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    2,539
    lol progressives

  7. #7
    Veteran EVAY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    7,563
    Awesome post, PixelPusher. The length dittohead and FoxNews conservatives (fascists?) go to to wrap themselves and their views in the flag is pathetic.
    +1.

    I could do without some of the 'over-the-top' rhetoric, but I would defend to the death Pixel-Pusher's right to say it. And the quotes were dynamite!!

  8. #8
    Veteran EVAY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    7,563
    When I read this thread le I thought it was about the former mayor of D.C.

  9. #9
    "Have to check the film" PixelPusher's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,396
    When I read this thread le I thought it was about the former mayor of D.C.
    "The set you up!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •