Hollywood pwns the Movie industry, not Kangaroos....
Nothing to read here folks
http://guyism.com/2010/01/australia-...s-in-porn.html
I wasn’t planning on covering this because, well, it’s Australia and they do lots of stupid things like jailing people for cartoon porn and whatever. But it’s a big story for all the itty bitty lovers out there because, in an effort to curtail kiddy porn and simulated kiddy porn, the Aussie government imposed censorship restrictions on adult films with flat chested gals.
The proposed Australian Government clampdown on smut just got a whole lot broader, as news emerged of a ban on small breasts and female ejaculation in adult material.
The end result of this widening of the censor’s net could be the addition of millions of websites to the internet filter now being proposed.
Breasts came under the spotlight a year ago, as Senators Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett commenced a campaign against publicly available porn. Rounding up magazines from corner shops and filling stations, Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia.
The result of this campaign is now visible in the decisions being made by the Australian Classification Board, which is beginning to apply RC (refused classification) categories to such material, as opposed to the previous X-rating. According to Fiona Patten, Convenor of the Australian Sex Party: “We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size.
“It may be an unintended consequence of the Senator’s actions but they are largely responsible for the sharp increase in breast size in Australian adult magazines of late.”
Australia of course has been under scrutiny for its designs on filtering the Internet, including all adult content. Which is a pretty big human rights violation, unless you’re in China, in which case it’d be followed by high fives and someone playing that “doo doo doo doo doo DOO doo doo DOO” sound. Plus I’m personally not a fan of a flat chest anyway. I say force them all to get implants or ship them off to New Zealand. No time for you, Pirate Ship Plank Chest.
And yes, if you read that first line above closely enough, they did in fact also ban female ejaculation. Which, frankly, I’m okay with. I don’t want to get a blast from a girly firehose while I’m down there. Too many flashbacks to my traumatic childhood. And if that happend now, I wouldn’t even get a new Ninja Turtles toy afterwards. All I’m saying is that if you’re going to take advantage of me like I was in my childhood sailor suit, you should probably give me the new kicking action Michelangelo toy or something.
UPDATE: Another site is disputing the scope of this report, citing the Australian Classification Board’s response.
A spokesperson for the ACB told me today that publications which contain offensive depictions or descriptions of persons who are or appear to be persons under the age of 18 (whether they are engaged in sexual activity or not) must be classified RC. They said the Board classifies publications on a case by case basis, in accordance with the Guidelines for the Classification of Publications, the Code and the Classification Act and that the Publications Guidelines do not specify breast size.
That doesn’t particularly sound like a denial as much as it does someone saying “No, we’re not explicitly banning small boobs but we’re going to do it whenever we see fit,” but hey, you be the judge. Check out Crikey.com.au for more.
Last edited by Cry Havoc; 01-30-2010 at 03:24 PM.
Hollywood pwns the Movie industry, not Kangaroos....
Nothing to read here folks
im more an ass man myself
That's re ed
WTF? Australia's more conservative and re ed than the US?
This is a beat-up story, of course:
It is really about clamping down on pseudo-kiddy porn.A spokesperson for the ACB told me today that publications which contain offensive depictions or descriptions of persons who are or appear to be persons under the age of 18 (whether they are engaged in sexual activity or not) must be classified RC. They said the Board classifies publications on a case by case basis, in accordance with the Guidelines for the Classification of Publications, the Code and the Classification Act and that the Publications Guidelines do not specify breast size.
Sadly, often that is the case. People under 40 are generally pretty progressive, but over 40 conservatism is entrenched. Makes me sick.
But the A cups....won't some one please think of the A cups.
Australia is probably the most backwards western nation by a good amount when it comes to general freedom. I can't believe the people let them censor everything like they live in north korea.
-3d body scanning
-Book banning
-Film banning
-Video game banning
-Music banning
-Internet censorship
I'm not going to pretend to be an expert, but the OFLC has so much power over there that it makes the american complaints against the RIAA/MPAA/FCC look like nothing.
Imagine the ESRB and MPAA ratings being controlled by the U.S. government. I have no idea why australia is so far behind in censorship/freedom, but it surprised me too when I learned how much power their gov't has!
Yeah, the latest moves by the Australian government have been pretty poor really... EVERYONE and i mean EVERYONE complained about the internet filtering, almost all of the major isps here said it was a bad idea, and yet they still went ahead and did it. The thing doesnt even protect versus proxy sites, ffs...
They also recently made all year 7 students purchase a laptop for $15 a week, that they have provided. A MAC, that isnt particularly even powerful - and is already outdated. And if you dont follow that plan, you get a worse one that is probably from the 80's. Not even allowed to bring your own PC or better MAC in...
They also want to have a national broadband system, that isn't even fast ... its maybe a bit better than we have now (which is still far worse than most developed countries) - i know there is a lot of land to cover, but still... 99% of the population lives in major cities.
Don't even get me started on the no R18+ computer game rating...
On the subject of pussies.. If they are banning A cups because it is inherant to small breasted underage girls.. the first thing that came to my mind is why the heck didn't they ban shaved pussies too? If anything is ment to look prepubesent.. well.. that would be the first thing to come to mind.
Who knew Australia was SR-ish . . .
Even SR wouldn't ban small s, that's probably all they get to see over there, at best.
yeah australia has had my attention on these things for a while
why the F is a western nation allowing this? it endangers the rest of us too, because people can point to australia and say "see, no problem!"
I legitimately don't know how tied down it is there, so if the question can't be answered, it's cool; is the pirating/black market there plentiful?
i love A border line B cups on women. They are usually way more sensitive
Yeah, that's massively overstating it, but there are some worrying moves afoot, like the internet filter.
Unfortunately conservative politics has controlled this country for 15 years, and even though we now have a supposedly Labor government, they are just conservatives in sheep's clothing. Ugh. It's the only thing about Australia I don't love.
That made me
What's considered small boobs anyway?
lol Aussies. Flatchested Aussie porn is going to be like diamonds now.
Smaller than us ...
![]()
Yeah, pirating/black market stuff is very plentiful down here - it's the same as anywhere else. Often, it's the only way you can get your hands on tv shows - unless you want to wait over a year for it to come out on the free-to-air tv here...
Dexter for example is only in like season 2 (maybe 3) i think over here?
They havent gotten control of torrents or anything yet (i think France has implemented that? I could be mistaken), but they seem to have left the doorway open for it with this new internet filter...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)