Reply With Quote
He's basically already passed him, this ring would just put it in stone.
He needs to win Sunday to really begin that conversation. This game is very important to his legacy. He needs 1-2 more rings.
He's basically already passed him, this ring would just put it in stone.
Not in my book. If he fails to win Sunday, I can't put him over Brady. If the Colts are that damn good, they will win Sunday. If Peyton Manning wants to be over Brady especially when it comes to the playoffs, he will have a great game Sunday. If the Colts D is that damn good, they will make plays.
A loss for Manning on Sunday would make the "Peyton>Brady" talk a joke.
Since left is such a dumbass, basically whatever she thinks, it's the exact opposite. Thanks!
You're an even bigger tool than I thought if you think the Saints can just double Mathis and magically not have to deal with a pass rush. What about safety or linebacker blitzes? Raheem Brock will start in Freeney's place if he can't play, and Brock is a pretty beastly dude even though it sounds like only Colts fans and Ray Rice know who he is.
And Manning just played the greatest game of his life against the #1 pass defense in the NFL. Do you really think this crappy Saints secondary can pull an '03 Pats on him? I mean, not that '10 Manning wouldn't be able to stomp the '03 Pats, I'm just saying this Saints defense isn't even close to being that good. And Gregg Williams has pretty much already said he's going to blitz the out of Manning, who may be the best ever against the blitz.
Bottomline is you're overrating the out of the Saints defense if you think the Colts couldn't hang with and eventually beat them in a no-one-plays-defense game.
Bottomline is you are taking me seriously BRAH when I explained the reasoning for my sarcasm in the page before. You just wasted time arguing with someone who was bull ting the entire time.
Last I checked...
3 rings > 1 (possibly 2) rings
4 SB appearances > 2 SB appearances
14-4 playoff record > 9-8 playoff record
50 TD season > 49 TD season
Beating Philip Rivers > Losing to Billy Volek
but yeah Manning has already surpassed Brady
You logged back in as mono just to post this flaming sack of turds?Last I checked...
3 rings > 1 (possibly 2) rings
4 SB appearances > 2 SB appearances
14-4 playoff record > 9-8 playoff record
50 TD season > 49 TD season
Beating Philip Rivers > Losing to Billy Volek
but yeah Manning has already surpassed Brady
1 (possibly 2) rings > 0 rings*Last I checked...
3 rings > 1 (possibly 2) rings
4 SB appearances > 2 SB appearances
14-4 playoff record > 9-8 playoff record
50 TD season > 49 TD season
Beating Philip Rivers > Losing to Billy Volek
but yeah Manning has already surpassed Brady
2 SB appearances > 1 SB appearance*
9-8 playoff record > 2-2 playoff record*
49 TD season < 50 TD season (took Brady an extra game and prob 200+ more pass attempts though)
Blowing out the Ravens at home > Getting blown out by the Ravens at home
*Stats adjusted to eliminate anything earned during Spygate
Yeah try finding that anywhere in the official NFL record books.
Post-Spygate Brady hasn't done other than choke on one.
We know this.
Peyton Manning better play a great game Sunday and the rest of the team better do their jobs. If the Colts fail to win sunday, this Manning>Brady talk isn't legit. We know this!
If Manning doesn't win the Manning vs. Brady talk will be as valid as the Marino vs. Montana talk.
Can we adjust stats to take away from any wins earned when noise was pumped into the RCA dome?
Good luck finding anything to corroborate this other than a ty youtube video.
At least there's evidence readily available. Let's see you post a rumored Spygate video.Good luck finding anything to corroborate this other than a ty youtube video.
I'd post a Spygate video if Goodell hadn't burned them all to cover up cheating in three Super Bowls.
yeah, not really.
the more i think about this game, the more confident i am the Saints will win it. Saints will end up winning the turnover battle by 1 or 2 and their offense will give the colts all kinds of trouble (175 yards rushing and 275 yards passing is feasible).
+1 Brady knew what the coverages were going to be. That's pretty dang helpful.
I always wondered after Belichick said he 'didn't know it wasn't allowed' why no one asked him "So did you use this tactic during your Super Bowl games? Why wouldn't you use such an effective tactic if you thought it was OK?" Bill either has to admit he used it during the Super Bowl wins (and tarnish them) or say he didn't use the tactic then and belie his earlier statement that he thought it was OK (though, honestly, everyone already knows he was telling a bald-faced lie anyway).
peyton beat the jets without their best d players
and runner
peyton will choke again sunday
what is he 8-7 in playoffs
I figured recent history would move them past this, but apparently Coltfan is still pretty butt hurt about how New England used to own them.
crofl defensive
hi
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
