BTW, thanks for making this thread about me. Again.
What was this thread supposed to be about? I don't know, but the issue became yours and the OP inability to read and comprehend a small newspaper article.
But if you want to discuss sentencing guidelines, I'm up for it. Try to read something beforehand though.
That's cool. I'm not.
I don't like being told what to do.
Uh? You didn't write this in response to what I wrote, right?
So, can you please explain the forum why have you created this thread?
Asked and answered.
Were you not paying attention the first time around?
How funny.
Winehole created a thread about sentencing guidelines.
An issue he doesn't want to discuss.
Oh well...
I already said I didn't. Are you deaf?
Why did he create the thread then? Especially considering the OP was a blatant lie?
Anyone who posts frequently will have a clinker or two. This was a clear clinker, but your imputation of a lie is hasty. Mere idleness or inattention is not the same as intent to deceive.
To claim the deception were manifest in intention, a few hostile inferences would have to be supplied.
You did not supply them. What a surprise. And you upbraid others for being lazy.
Maybe he opened a thread about sentencing guidelines while having no intention of discussing sentencing guidelines because, in the end, any issue is good to write indignant pla udes about nothing.
I found some aspects of this do ent a bit disturbing.
Like?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
