Who's better: Parker or Rose?

[Leetonidas]

^Exactly. I have no problem saying that Rose will be better than Parker when he's in his prime. But to say he's better than Tony now is laughable.

[DPG21920]

Well peace out Parkerfan. I'll check back into this poll later. My guess is Parker will only be getting votes from Spurfan.

But I have to agree with the above posts, right now at this instance, Rose is playing better than Tony Parker. But if you're comparing a 2007 Parker vs Current Rose, then I'd have to go with Parker. Rose does have a greater potential.

So not only were you wrong about this, but even a Bulls fan agrees

[Frank Lucas]

Alright, here's some nice stats.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../gamelog/2009/


Parker has 29 games where he scored 20-29 points. Not including the playoffs, Parker scored 30+ on 13 occasions, including a 55 point game and a 42 point game. He also had 25 double doubles last season while Rose has had a whopping 2 this year. Parker had 15 games of 10-15 assists last year while Rose this year has had 2, never topping 14.

o every other game doesn't count?

[badfish22]

http://www.nba.com/2010/news/feature...s=iref:nbahpt1

owned

[XFactor]

So not only were you wrong about this, but even a Bulls fan agrees

I voted based on the assumption that you're asking who is the better player right now. And I voted for Rose in that case.

[Muser]

But I have to agree with the above posts, right now at this instance, Rose is playing better than Tony Parker. But if you're comparing a 2007 Parker vs Current Rose, then I'd have to go with Parker. Rose does have a greater potential.

Even Bull fan gets it.

[Frank Lucas]

I voted based on the assumption that you're asking who is the better player right now. And I voted for Rose in that case.

That was the question. I don't care who the better player was in 2007, that irrelevant.

[Leetonidas]

http://www.nba.com/2010/news/feature...s=iref:nbahpt1

I don't give a what that says, a player cannot be in the MVP race if his team if below .500 in the EASTERN CONFERENCE. If Kobe couldn't win it in 2006, there's no way in Rose has a snowball's chance in , so that's completely irrelevant. Besides, we'll see where he finishes at the end of the season in MVP voting. Until then it's kind of a moot point.

[Frank Lucas]

Even Bull fan gets it.

Check the poll results. Spurfan is the only fan base who has voted for Parker so far.

[Frank Lucas]

I don't give a what that says

I'm sure you'd feel the same way if Parker's name were up there.

[Leetonidas]

I'm sure you'd feel the same way if Parker's name were up there.

Let's get this straight: Parker is not even one of my top 3 favorite players on the Spurs. But you can't deny how good he is. You don't lead a team missing their heart and soul, not to mention their best player being injured for half the season going into the playoffs, to 54 wins in a stacked Western conference. Not to mention Tony has been voted in by the coaches 3 times while D-Will, who is regarded as the best or #2 PG in the league, just got his first this year, that goes to show that the coaches know a load more than you do.

[DPG21920]

He is trolling. Once again, what is your point? Is it to say that Rose is playing better right now? If so, no fan will argue with you and why do you need two threads for that. Or are you trying to say he is the better player? If that is the case, you are, as explained, an idiot.

[IronMexican]

I think Parker is a bit more consistent, but Rose has higher high's. I'd take Rose for this season.

[Frank Lucas]

Let's get this straight: Parker is not even one of my top 3 favorite players on the Spurs. But you can't deny how good he is. You don't lead a team missing their heart and soul, not to mention their best player being injured for half the season going into the playoffs, to 54 wins in a stacked Western conference. Not to mention Tony has been voted in by the coaches 3 times while D-Will just got his first this year, that goes to show that the coaches know a load more than you do.

Parker didn't lead them to 54 wins. Quit saying that. They went 47-25 with him playing. Also, they went 22-16 when Manu was out, maybe Parker shouldered more of a load last season, but it's not like neither Duncan nor Manu were a reason they won 54 games.

The coaches also voted D-Rose and D-Will in over Parker this year. That goes to show that the coaches know a load more than you do.

[DPG21920]

Yes, Rose is playing better than Parker this year, who is disagreeing with you idiot?

[Frank Lucas]

Yes, Rose is playing better than Parker this year, who is disagreeing with you idiot?

The level Rose is playing at this year is higher than the level Parker has played at for all but 1-2 seasons in his career. The Derrick Rose we're seeing right now is better than the Parker we've seen most of his career.

[JamStone]

Rose is the better player this season.

[redzero]

redzero with the tie breaker!

[Frank Lucas]

So Spurfan voted for Parker, every other fan voted for Rose. What a coincidence.

[Kevin Durant 35]

Rose. In fact I think even Russell Westbrook is better than TP

[spurs10]

You're only as good as your accomplishments. Rose is very good, however the chance of him ever being a winner in the same echelon as Parker is a long shot.

[mystargtr34]

Rose has been better this season.

[Frank Lucas]

You're only as good as your accomplishments. Rose is very good, however the chance of him ever being a winner in the same echelon as Parker is a long shot.

I guess Derek Fisher is better than either one since he's more of a "winner".

[Chieflion]

Screw this. Misclicked Tony Parker. I was actually going to vote for Derrick Rose cause he was better this season.

[Frank Lucas]

STILL no non-Spurs fan votes for Parker.