With Butler and Haywood, what would the Rockets' starting 5 be?
Brooks
Butler
Ariza
Scola
Haywood
?
With Battier, Landry, Budinger, and Hayes off the bench.
Good, get rid of Tmac and prevent the Mavs from shooting themselves in the foot in the process.
With Butler and Haywood, what would the Rockets' starting 5 be?
Brooks
Butler
Ariza
Scola
Haywood
?
With Battier, Landry, Budinger, and Hayes off the bench.
perhaps you should do a little more watching and a little less talking, because you sound like a total ing dumbass to take Howard over Butler at this point.
Butler is a JUMPSHOOTER, and I'm the one supposed to be doing the watching? Open your slanted little Korean eyes broseph.
Neither one is worth anything close to what they are paid. Since Butler's contract runs beyond this year, Howard is a better option. That trade doesn't make Dallas a contender, all it does is hurt their cap situation.
Whats funny is Josh and Caron both put up similar numbers per 40 minutes, difference being Josh has been HURT all season long. Josh and Caron both suck, if I'm going to have to pick between 2 ty players, I want the one who's contract is coming off the books after this season.
the ONLY reason to want Howard is for the expiring contract.
ill take the way butler plays over the way howard plays all day. the dude can drive and slash quite well, and even if he decides to shoot jumpers, its a of a lot better than seeing howard shoot turnarounds, fadeaways, and stepbacks.
And Lowry as well
Yet only shoots 42.2% from the field. You're not trading for 2007 or 2008 Butler, you're trading for a guy who's out of shape and chucks jumpers too much now.
Howard's contract > Butler's 42%, 26% from three chucking play. If we don't make a trade that helps us contend, then we just need to go ahead and rebuild. Dampiers, Goodens, and Josh's 30 mil off the books, and keeping Beaubois is a good start.
If we get Butler we better get Haywood as well, and there better have been no way Iggy was available (w/o taking Brand)
lol mav-
Nah. I won't stoop to the mav fans level. It might be over for the spurs, but it looks like the mavs are coming with them
Well at least both teams have had success in the past.
Oh wait, I mistakenly took Dallas as Houston. My bad.![]()
4 rings, got.
you act as if he will keep shooting that poorly, as if being on a team thats actually good, wont help at all. typcially, players that are tired and disgruntled from constantly being on a garbage team, when they go to a good team, play at a much higher level. see pau gasol 2 years ago.
me personally, i think if they can trade howard, barea, and gooden for butler and heyward, they can most definitely contend. if it doesnt work, then you got two nice expiring contracts in damp and heyward to use to try to start rebuilding.
It was actually 6 if you had paid attention. The other 2 were at the expense of the spurs in the mid 90's.![]()
just saw a report from a source saying that this trade "doesnt have legs right now"
great we dont play you guys again til the last game of the season....
Great post. Stupid front office.![]()
which means the same exorbitant money to be paid for his "legit performances" as Mavs starting center. Honestly Damp has been playing fine this season and I do appreciate it, which however only gains me more anger at him considering how many championships the Mavs would have achieved for the past several years had Dampier played with half effort/at ude he currently shows. Dude is playing for nothing but getting his final year protected and feigning the expression that he's worth decent money, which would probably get another fool to offer him another lucrative contract after his term expires in Dallas.
In this sense, Dampier's contract is better to get shipped RIGHT NOW than any time exceeding the point when Donnie is to make a tough decision on whether to execute the team option or free this wanker to 2010 FA market.
Despite how decent Dampier players, his market value wouldn't be any bigger than an expiring contract and an expiring contract this season is guaranteed to be more valuable than an expiring contract with same size and details yet expiring next year, given the pressures of the luscious 2010 free agents.
agreed, hence it doesn't make any sense to take Butler's contract for any reason. I know many teams are seeking contracts that expire come summer for financial reliefs and Caron Butler doesn't even make a chance to be comparable to what those teams would probably offer. what's lame is Donnie started his action too ing late to get the best deal and consequently he's now only having a handful of offers to choose from.
they'll never excel as long as cuban wants to be their buddy.
It only rarely happens when a player from ty team turns gold after swapping to contenders. Mavs happened to get such a player back in Don's era from the trade of JET, but I doubt luck will always stand on Mavs side and you're easy to find it by checking Carter and RDJ.
If Caron's style of play truly would benefit Mavs alot, I would rather trade the same stocks for some other players the same style who could be had for less costs, like RDJ.
Washington just offered Butler+Stevenson for Josh Howard, but the Mavs declined. Hopefully they are trying to get Haywood in this deal. Or, better yet, Donnie thinks he can actually pull out his first good deal w/o his daddy and get Iggy to Dallas.
even if the mavs get butler or iggy they still are light years behind LA and they arent even better than Denver...3rd best in the west lets get done Donnie
anyway the Mavs already are the 3rd, or at worst the 4th best team currently in West. lateral moves...
I agree that Butler isn't someone who would bring significant upgrades and he isn't worth our trying IMHO, but Iggy should be quite a nice signing for Mavs if Donnie could wrap him up without losing any prominent talent the Mavs currently have. at least such a move would escalate the Mavs to the 2nd place in western conference even if it still isn't enough to challenge the lakers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)