Well, I look at it as that's the reason he won't be traded....because he's valuable now and wasn't back then. If the Spurs didn't get rid of him then, I can't see them getting rid of him now that he does have value.
Are you saying we'll be able to get more in return for him now?
We supposedly could have had VC, but we didn't want to include Hill in the deal. I can't remember if that was before or after the original news of his wang coming out....no pun intended.

Reply With Quote


