Pop had declared the chances for a le dead with Manu's injury. It's simply inconceivable that anyone would be surprised the way the Spurs rolled over and died, and inexplicable that anyone would hold a grudge going into this season. That said, it it looks like that's exactly what happened. I just don't know how you can understand it as though it makes some kind of sense.
Mason for Ronnie brewer? Does that work?
He was wrong or something?
Yuck...
You know good and well that a comment like that doesn't exactly help the team believe in themselves.He was wrong or something?
Why do people want Tyrus Thomas? Isn't he known for a low basketball IQ, limited skillset and barely being 6-10? In what way would he help us?
I can't blame him.
Considering the FO was targeting him for two seasons before actually signing him, I guess it's safe to say they were way off judging RMJ's talent...
Is it save to assume that if the spurs are trading mason because of lack of minutes, then in return they plan to get someone who can play meaninful minutes, in which case we'll see an expiring deal package?
I actually think Pop was trying to loosen them up with that comment...
The Lakers didn't have Gasol and the Celtics didn't have Garnett when they were targeting him. The NBA has changed a lot since then.
You guys are such ing hypocrites.
He said it before Manu was out though. He didn't know Manu would be out for the season. It was a stupid comment and there was no need for it.
He probably is. However, Bonner is currently the second best defensive bigman on the team.
So he must be on the trading block, too then.
Although that probably says the more about the team than anything else . . .
We can't all suck off Pop. That is your job and you EXCEL at it.
You guys are such ing hypocrites.
Mason was of great help in last year playoffs...........
Or his talent was there and he just didn't work?
It happens ya know... Things that would in theory work but for some reason or another just not....
Not EVERYTHING can work out 100%.
yes he ing washe was wrong or something?
had he not ruided their confidence
this team does not soley rest on a overpaid manu
Or I'm just realistic?
I know I hate it when my confidence is ruided.
Mason would be better suited playing for a offense happy team. Mason's game conflicts with everything Pop wants out on the floor which is solid defense. Bring up Malik to backup Hill and Manu and get a big for Mason.
You see this is classic, had he said "We can beat anyone, even without manu" You would've been one of the first ones on here saying "WTF is he smoking and why is he bsing the team?"
ing hypocrites....
I just don't get that the Spurs FO is cool about it. Who do they have ahead of him and why?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
