you know me, just trying to get a stab in there![]()
Hey, we ain't that crappy. Don't lump us in with the Warriors who have been doing some good without Monta Ellis. And the Blazers were not bad too.
you know me, just trying to get a stab in there![]()
Without Pau, there was always Marc Gasol and Pau's $16 million contract to play with.
Who can say whether or not Marc Gasol and another elite player wouldn't make the Lakers a big time favorite?
Marc Gasol 15 & 10 rebounds + $16 million player
versus
Pau Gasol 17 & 11 rebounds
Wow the Lakers finally lost a game without Kobe, on a Fisher miss at the buzzer. I was impressed with the 4 game win streak.
24-9 without Adam Morrison That is .735 ball.
18-4 With him. That is .810
Just saying.![]()
OOOO NOT AGAIN ALLANON!!!!
Though I will admit I was wrong on Marc. He is not a scrub and is a VERY solid player. You were right on him.
But we are so much better off with Pau. We can run the offense through him. Takes pressure off everyone. Commands a double. Let's not get into this agaiN!
Laker fans have fallen trying to compare Adam Morrison to Kobe Bryant.
Mother er, here you go killin' my game again.
Alright, I'll explain it. I'm responding to this , fool.
Spurfan tries to make Lakers look ty "#5 seed" without Pau "collusion" theories; and I post Marc Gasol's numbers to bust that up and add the fact we had Pau's $16 million to play with. That's the way this game goes.
Stop mf'n killin' my , time and time again, Milkshake. You're ruining it cuz I ain't gonna argue with fellow Lakerfan![]()
Would you trade Pau today for Marc and say Deron Williams? In a heartbeat! We would have had all that cap room to sign a top teir pg.
and your comparing a 5 game sample to Kobe's 12 yrs as a laker.
I am comparing this season.
yeah, brotha Cobb.
ok..so you would sit Kobe for the rest of the season if you were Phil?
Apparently you didn't grasp the intent of the post. It was not to compare Kobe to Morrison. It was to show the absurdity of the numbers you posted. I just chose to use biggest bust in the NBA over the last decade to further show the obvious fail in your logic.
I didn't say they would go 82-0 without Kobe. They would be better off with Kobe taking only 18 shots a game.
It wasn't absurd. Kobe plays big minutes. Morrison, eh..... And Morrison isn't the biggest bust the past decade.
It was completely absurd as are most your hater posts... and IMO Morrison is the biggest bust. Certainly in the argument.
Maybe, but I think you guys are just so easy to troll, that I would join in the fun. I don't really hate Kobe that much. Darko is the biggest bust. Drafted behind LeBron, ahead of Wade, Melo and Bosh, you would expect him to have a few all-star selections at least.
I dont care how much shots Kobe takes as long as his Fg% was good during the game. The lakers obviously needed someone to shoot the ball after the 7 minute mark. The rest of the team turned into pussies.
LOL 2 pts in the final 7 minutes..We definitely dont need Kobe...BTW why is our "MVP" Pau so scared to take shots & ft's in crunch time? in guy is a baller but shrinks into a lil girl when you need him to score in a close game..The team is definitely lucky to have a guy with balls of steel to close out games.
Big men generally aren't known as consistent closers..
Even though he's been inefficient on game winners throughout his career, Kobe is a better option at closing out games than any of the other Lakers perimeter players..that's why Pau needs Kobe as a sidekick, to close out games, at least that's what all the Laker fans in this thread have implied..
youre freaking awesome![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)