Wow...
Free laptops from the school, then they remotely activate the web-cams.
I'm sure they realize the kids might be naked in their bedrooms...
Pa. school official defended in webcam spy case
Suit: Pa. school used webcams to spy on students
Great banner, WC. How'd you pick it?
You mean the le?
Well, what would you call it if adults want to spy on minors, at home, likely in their bedrooms?
its not that far off from what you did.
you used a computer and cameras to tell a women you knew how to find her.
I wonder if he referring to your avatar.
No, had that one for some time now. Maybe he had too much wine.
Don't pediphiles love pedicabs?
or do they love feet?
http://www.footfetishtube.com/
Banner is a near synonym for headline. Please see meaning 2 @: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/banner. le works too. Maybe meaning 5 of banner created perplexity, and weighs in favor of le. Cheryl Steele seemed to share your confusion.
Taken under advisement, WC. I'll probably just say headline from now on.
Parental or quasi-parental supervision, most likely. What you're you're talking about is by no means impossible, but it wouldn't be my first inference.Well, what would you call it if adults want to spy on minors, at home, likely in their bedrooms?
Didn't the school originally let the cat out of the bag by lodging a complaint about a student's spare time activities with the parents?
Schools function in loco parentis anyway, and in this case, they would appear to be merely monitoring the users of their expensive equipment, and giving due feedback to parents.
Haw haw haw.
Last edited by Winehole23; 02-22-2010 at 04:16 AM.
I don't see how anyone is defending the school on this one.
For now, the problem can be solved with a small piece of electrical tape.
WH just did, and I can't believe he did.
There is absolutely no excuse for the school officials activities.
The law is very clear about this. It is flat out illegal to monitor inside non public (or is it written private) areas without a court order.
Perhaps the "haw haw haw" was too subtle.
With the way he responds to me, I take it as him laughing at me. Not joking about what he says.
he does both. you've decided to fall for sarcasm.
Exactly, unbelievable that anyone would defend such a violation of fundamental privacy laws. Rep, Dem or Independent, most people would find this conduct offensive and an intrusion of our rights and thus a violation of our cons utional right to privacy.
Get with it people, it's just plain wrong. Americans should be pissed.
I should have blued it. There's no such thing as being too obvious, I guess. I thought a smiley plus har-de-har-har would do it. Seems not.
Unless, of course, you're hunting terrorists by monitoring telephone calls.
As long as you're a patriot you have nothing to worry about...............
Those are some sick mother ers peaking in on those kids!!!!! What were they THINKING!!!!!!!!!
This gives me a great idea for a Revenge of the Nerds remake...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)