Reply With Quote
I thought so too until they contradicted each other on who carried the Spurs in some of their le seasons. But maybe that's just good trolling.
Hes just ing re ed. I'm starting to think DAF made another account so he wouldn't be the only dumb arguing this hilarious opinion.
I thought so too until they contradicted each other on who carried the Spurs in some of their le seasons. But maybe that's just good trolling.
Nice to have a serious and deep discussion with Mavs fans. This one really proved why you have failed in 06. Have a good time trying to nail anything with Haywood as a Center.
See ya.
Stephen Jackson is going to carry a team to the playoffs.
The 2004/06 Pistons were elite (and NBA champions) and nobody on that team was better than Manu.
Really I love Manu, he's been a freakin' stud but you trade him straight up for Dirk if Dallas are that stupid to accept. Duncan/Dirk probably 3 peat, if not more.
The sad thing is, Ginobili uses better grammar than you...
It's a lot better than the sacks of the Spurs are trying to run out at the 5.
You could make the playoffs with prime Manu as your best player, you just can't build around Manu if you want to be contenders. Manu was on a very good team, that played very good defense. lol at you thinking Manu is some kind of franchise player that you could have built a NBA champion team around.
And to you second point, Chauncey Billups. Plus that point is re ed because there was no one on that team better than Dirk. so.......
what is your point
That 2004/2006 Pistons team just had beasty Defense and some fantastic chemistry.
Do you remember Manu making 20+ pts on 9 FG attempts in the most important playoffs games?
Yes, hence why I called him a stud. I also remember him commiting one of the most dumbass fouls i've ever seen in all of sports. But you take the good with the bad with Manu.
Dirk > Manu.
Let's put it this way, take Dirk off the 2006 Dallas team and replace him with Manu. Do Dallas get to the Finals? Do they win it all??
Nice to see you backpedaling on this
I don't think you could build a championship team around Manu but you could definitely build a pretty good one, though if you would have asked me if I thought a team lead by Billups could be NBA champions I'd have said no.
No, Billups wasn't a better player than Manu back then, go do some research and see what most people were saying in 2005.And to you second point, Chauncey Billups. Plus that point is re ed because there was no one on that team better than Dirk. so.......
what is your point
And my point was that Manu could have lead a NBA team to the playoffs.
Don't try rational thinking with DAF. He is just a blind Manu homer. When I see two dogs in an avater, I usually just keep scrolling.
Not only don't they make the finals...they barely make the playoffs
Does Argentina win gold with Dirk instead of Manu or do the Spurs win in '05 with Nowitzki instead of Ginobili?
I don't think so.
Yeah, Build around Dirk and you see the results...
You are 100% right Dirk is a better SG than Manu
DAF86 is a Spurs fan from Argentina
Umm Yes and Yes cause Dirk is the better player...now SHUT THE UP DUMMY...I say that with the utmost respect
lol could have
lol never has
lol dirk
lol 9 (going on 10) straight playoff appearances
lol dumbass
When I see Don Nelson coaching Crawford I keep reading 'cause I don't know who the are you.
If Spurs had Dirk after the 2003 Finals they win les for fun.
Watch any of Manu 05/07 PO games. And you'll see what we're talking about. You Mavs fans are just trying to downplay Manu.
Are these the years Manu led the Spurs?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions