Spurs interested in Bulls' Thomas?

[TJastal]

Red - But you know you won't get that consistently.......from either player, so quit nuthugging. It's one game. Get back to me when he does something meaningful for a significant stretch of time.

Blue - My point? Perhaps you missed Boozers stat line....I'll repeat it: 33 and 16 on 13-16. That's a direct indictment on the interior D.

What does salary have to do with anything? So you expect the same problems when he goes against the Nowitskis, Stoudemires and the Garnetts of the world? Laughable since that's precisely why he would have been brought in: To contain those guys, not give up 33 and 16.

Purple - As you yourself write, you don't know. Talking out of your ass again. Oh, and LOL at the plus minus giving ANY indication as to what position the scoring was coming from at any given time.

/facepalm

So you think Thomas was the culprit for Boozer going off in the 2nd half, even though he's not the starting PF and Diaw is, and he had by far the worst +/- of any bobcat for the game.

If that's your position, then there's really nothing I can argue that's gonna change your mind. You can go back to your shroom induced obsession with colors now..

[ohmwrecker]

While I disagree with letting go of Ratliff (because I think he could help us) for miniscule cap relief and a protected draft pick that is so far away that it is pointless to discuss, the FACT remains that the Bulls just simply did not want our garbage. That's it. Case closed. Move on, please.

[Agloco]

Yall can keep denying Thomas all you want, but the numbers don't lie.... 4 game averages since he got traded:

28 minutes per game
52.7% shooting
12.8 points
7.5 rebounds
3.5 blocks
1.5 steals
13-15 from the free throw line
and the stat about their defensive FG% at the rim being over 10% below the league average since he and Theo got there.

Ok. But make no mistake here, I'm in favor of TT. What I'm arguing is TJastal's attempt to pull any meaningful info out of a 4 game sample. That's silly.

/facepalm

So you think Thomas was the culprit for Boozer going off in the 2nd half, even though he's not the starting PF and Diaw is, and he had by far the worst +/- of any bobcat for the game.

If that's your position, then there's really nothing I can argue that's gonna change your mind. You can go back to your shroom induced obsession with colors now..

Red - Perhaps you need to re-examine the definition of plus-minus, or maybe the concept is just a bit out of your reach yet. The more trash you post, the more you confirm our su ions. Learn what information that stat gives you (and more inmportantly what it doesn't....) then come back and discuss it on the same level as I do. Until then, there's really no point in going on about it.

Oh, and on a point of common sense: Do you think Larry Brown might have pulled Boris in favor of TT if he was getting lit up that badly? Hmmm.....

Orange - Shroom induced obsession in overdrive. Enjoy.

[Dro210]

Ok. But make no mistake here, I'm in favor of TT. What I'm arguing is TJastal's attempt to pull any meaningful info out of a 4 game sample. That's silly.

Ok..... but if you take his 23 minutes per game he was averaging in Chicago, and bump all the stats to reflect the 28 he's averaging in Charlotte... those numbers are almost identical. The more the guy gets to play, the more he's gonna perform. It's not gonna stop.

[Bartleby]

It's not gonna stop.