Reply With Quote
I said nothing of the kind. I merely posted an article that I found interesting. I didn't force anyone into this thread. Everyone entered willingly.
The thread le was the actual le of the article, so I didn't even come up with that.
Stop trying so hard and you will be more successful.
I said nothing of the kind. I merely posted an article that I found interesting. I didn't force anyone into this thread. Everyone entered willingly.
The thread le was the actual le of the article, so I didn't even come up with that.
Thank you for your perspective Benefactor.
But I am satisfied with the way and the content I post.
This is such BS.
You posted an article led "Archaeologist sees proof for Bible in ancient wall". It wasn't merely an article you found interesting. It was an attempt to shove some sort of proof for the Bible in the face of your detractors. Tell me...how is this showing love to an unbelieving world?
Outta curiosity, would you label an article posted supporting evidence refuting the Bible/creationism/etc the same way?
Do you really think I have that kind of time on my hands?
Do you honestly think I spend my days plotting against faceless mere acquaintances that I happen to share space with on the Internet?
The article was featured on the front page of Yahoo. I saw it when I was on Yahoo to check my e-mail.
I thought the article was interesting and so I posted it. End of story and hopefully the end of your conspiracy concerns.
I assure you I am in no way, shape, or form plotting against any of you.
I don't agree or disagree with what you say or quote.
I'm just saying that personally, having lived most of my life around Texan Bible belt Baptists, most Christians I know or have known believe in a literal translation.
They also believe that the Earth was literally created in 7 days.
I'm not sure what you are getting at here. I didn't label the article as anything. She claims to have had no agenda in posting the article...when it's obvious she did.
No...I don't think you spend all of your time plotting like that, but that doesn't change the fact that you had an agenda when you posted the article.
You knew that there were plenty of people that post here who do not believe in the Bible and you felt like that you might be able to sway someone by posting an article like this...or at least that's what you tell yourself. The real truth is you are fed up and frustrated with people on this site trashing the Bible and you wanted to get your two pennies in. Upon reading the article you thought to yourself, "Hey, this is pretty good stuff. I can take it to Spurstalk and shut some of those guys up that constantly trash the Bible." You didn't need to spend much time at all calculating your move, because it was an automatic reaction. I know...I used to be just like you.
The fact still remains that nothing fruitful can come out of you posting an article like this. Even if I am way off base with my assessment of your motives(I think I'm right on), it doesn't change the impression given when someone sees what the article is about and then looks at who posted it...an impression that states, "You are wrong, I am right. Here's my proof."
Simple question to all the religious nut- frea- people reading this thread.
If the bible predicted/foretold the future and the end of mankind why weren't they able to foreshadow technology? The internet? The snuggie?
Seriously.
You really know how to charm them.
Daniel 12:4
But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
