It's called the oligarchy, applies to every politician, most of whom leave Congress a lot richer than when they entered.
Like the always-wrong conservatism, oligarchy applies to any party.
Pelosi is worth almost 100,000,000 dollars!!!!! Looks real greedy from a libs perspective.
Jane Harman (D-Calif) $377,275,000
Herb Kohl (D-Wis) $265,629,996
Mark Warner (D-Va) $346,085,992
John Kerry (D-Mass) $258,959,049
Jared Polis (D-Colo) $265,609,998
Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa) $128,416,002
Frank R Lautenberg (D-NJ) $101,856,020
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif) $101,849,018
Alan Grayson (D-Fla) $77,963,998
Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass) $74,094,000
Harry Teague (D-NM) $40,275,465
Carolyn B Maloney (D-NY) $62,004,993
Nita M Lowey (D-NY) $54,190,060
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) $95,980,989
Yvette D Clarke (D-NY) $50,000,000
It's called the oligarchy, applies to every politician, most of whom leave Congress a lot richer than when they entered.
Like the always-wrong conservatism, oligarchy applies to any party.
You're such a ing idiot. As if a comparable list doesn't exist for the GOP. The difference being the super rich GOP cries socialism over a few percentage points of their taxes.
We've see the list last year. Rich Democrats really outnumber rich republicans.
Dare you to look it up and prove yourself the fool for that statement.
jack and WC are big on class warfare.
They envy the rich.
jack and WC are big on class warfare.
They envy the rich.
You are a petty and insecure little .
I don't think he will.
I don't think so either, that's why I posted the "five richest" link.
You're the one whining about other people's having much, much, much more money than you will ever have.
Jack, I think Dump Chomper here needs to take those colored glasses off. Keeps him from seeing the truth. What do you think?
What truth?
Those people are quite rich.
You are not.
You envy their wealth, so you whine about it online.
That's the truth.
You are laughably wrong.
sure, I would like to be rich, but I wouldn't classify it as envious. You see, I understand that America gives free thinking people the opportunity to become rich. It's lib s like you, who believe that you have to take from the rich, then don't realize your hypocrisy, because you are a lemming to masters who are hypocritical about their own wealth.
So are you saying they don't want to take from the rich because they are themselves rich?
Then why do you whine about them so much?
what do you have againt rich people dummy?
No. Haven't you noticed there are generally loopholes in legislation that they and their rich friends use? They just get the productive rich. Not the elitist rich, in new taxes.
I simply point out the hypocrisy.
So you need to prove they write in loopholes for themselves and pay none of the taxes they pass.
I know you won't, because you wilt like a pussy when you are asked to prove yourself.
With class warfare propaganda and the vague, baseless, accusations of an envious pussy.I simply point out the hypocrisy.
I'm not playing in your circle jerk no longer. You are now in typical Chump Mode.
Always requiring proof from someone else, and never offering proof of your views.
Bye.
I have plenty of proof you are using class warfare propaganda and vague, baseless accusations.
It's all over this thread.
Now, as predicted, you went full pussy on us and ran from the thread. It's hilariously pathetic.
He wants to argue about YOU and not discuss the topic. It's written all over his 40 something thousand post. Also, he is butthurt the owners of this site took away his powers. He can't ban people that disagree with him. He troll's the board attacking posters because he thinks he is some spewstalk superhero when in reality he is a insecure petty little . He knows it. That's good enough for me.
Why not point to their dumb ing policies as proof they are not for the "poor" instead of their dolla dolla bills ya'll.
People have. I have. I had no clue they were this rich. These are not rich folks, these are some ing rich folks and they want to keep taxing people.
What I would like to know is how many of these Dem's sent their kids to private school, yet are unwilling to acknowledge the country's public schools are broke and need a voucher system of some kind.
A few percentage points? In some cases that can equal a few million...if you had even a concept of what it was like to have ONE million dollars, you'd show some respect and empathize with the rich that do not want the government intruding on their earnings to pay for your idiot schools, roads, and general infrastructure.
If I was a lefty communist pinko like yourself, I'd love the righty whitey slave masters to play the "Super Rich Dem card" because it shows the Dems are willing to part with more of their own money when it comes to raising taxes to fund their programs.
Anyway, I spit on the poor.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)