There are no stupid threads, only stupid posters who stupidly click on them and then stupidly post something that in no way contributes to the discussion.
It's like they are too stupid to just, go to another thread they actually want to read...they stay stupidly trapped making stupid posts never realizing they could go somewhere else with merely a click.
Stupid indeed.
These are the people that actually get on rafts to get into Cuba. Luckily there aren't many of them.
Whottt back with a vengeance. Good to see.
But you're wrong here. Most of the animosity towards Pop isn't necessarily about the fact that he hasn't won either of the last two les. It's that, over time, he has gone from getting the best out of his players to actually getting in the way.
For evidence, let's look at Dallas. Over the past 3 years, Dallas has achieved mental ownership of the Spurs. ing Dallas! One of the softest elite teams in NBA history.
It started in 2006 when Pop went small against them... Whether you agreed with the strategy or not, it showed that Dallas dictated the matchup. They were the leaders and we had to pull out our bag of tricks to beat them. We handed them a mental edge they didn't have before the series. And they still almost blew it.
Now they look forward to playing San Antonio and expect to whip our butts. The 2009 first round was an embarrassment and should never have played out that way, Manu or no Manu. The Dallas ing Mavericks should not have a mental edge over any of the relevant teams in the NBA, but they have it against the Spurs. They expect to beat us if we face them in the Playoffs, and Pop will coach as if he expects to lose.
Maybe he needs a change of scenery. It's hard to think of any coach that has stayed with the same team for 10+ years and kept them at an elite level. Who knows what might have happened to Phil Jackson if he had stayed with the Bulls for five more years. But whether it's out of boredom or a de-evolution in philosophy, Pop 2010 is not the same coach as Pop 2005, even when you factor in the caliber of players those teams had.
Yup, it's always good to see whottt.
Pop has been playing small ball because we have nobody good enough to play legit tall ball. Why the else would Tim Duncan be playing center?
bump
yup.
Yep, it's pretty clear that this team needs a Bowen clone and a dominant big next to Duncan in order to succeed rather than less Keith Bogans and less smallball like some of us have been saying all year.
Lol 2010
I am sick of all the blame is on pop
he got the team to shoot better % from the stripe
(most spur fans wanted spurs to shoot better)
spurs were a couple of breaks from being champs this year
knicks,lakers and the rest of the nab would glady change places
even mark cuban would
Lol obstructed_view
Just lol
spurs have his name is kl
but kl is better on o then bowen
yup another year Pop choked away
You're stupid.
Now change my quote, puppet.
SA210 can't cope with the fact that nobody likes him or agrees with his dimbass statements, so he changes people's quotes in order to feel better about himself.
Boring = 4 rings
Preach it! This is the truth!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
