lol Manu>Dirk
If the Spurs want to tank for another #1 pick in the draft, their best bet would be to hand the keys of the franchise over to Manu. Let him lead the team to that glorious 15 win season.
Manu was also the number one option on this game
lol Mavs
you're trying to use that to prove he can beat a good team? lol
You did the same, but the other way around.
No I didn't. I simply proved he can lose to a ty team. You proved he can also beat a ty team.
I didn't have to prove he could beat a good team, you did. And you failed.
You know who else could beat ty teams and lose to ty teams and couldn't beat good teams as a #1 guy? Kevin Martin.
LOL manu = kmart
You're right the Mavs are a ty team, here's another 37 pts performance from Manu that helped the Spurs to beat the Jazz at that time the current WC finalist, is the next game to that Mavs one, still with no Tim.
lol on 8-12-07 the NBA wasn't in season.
and even if they meant December 8 of 2007, the Jazz wasn't playing San Antonio, they were losing to Dallas.
Get your dates right, homey.
andat this anyways, even in a game where Duncan or Parker is out, the other one was still in and Ginobili was still the #2 on the team.
only a blind Manu homer would say he's ahead of Duncan or Parker in the Spurs pecking order.
Sons the question of manu being a number 1 guy on a team is moot.... Because he will be hobbling on 1 foot by the 40 games mark.
Better yet only a blind Manu homer would say Manu could be the #1 option on a contending NBA team.
Here are the Spurs beating this season's Mavs without Tony and Tim (therefore with Manu as their number one option) enjoy.
Who's saying that?
However Mono when the Spurs were winning championships Manu was ahead of Parker. Manu has always been a better overall player than Parker. It's no coincidence the Spurs stopped contending once Parker became the main perimeter option over Manu.
Statistically Parker might have been better in 2007 but that had a lot to do with Manu playing less minutes. When they needed big shots at the end of games they were Manu's shots to take.
I've heard you say that before.
I won't make you waste your time asking for a link (if you do want to waste your time, go ahead). What I said was that Manu could be the number one option of a pretty good team on the NBA but not a contender, whoever I also said that I never thought a team lead by Chauncey Billups could end up winning a NBA championship.
So are you admitting that dirk>manu?(since dirk has been the #1 on a contender team?). lol manu>dirk.
TJastal viewing thread, brace yourselves for something really in stupid.
43pts, 5ast, 6reb, 13-25 FG, 14-17 FT.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)