Reply With Quote
Try the majority of the American public...Swung to what? A cottage industry of nutters and a bad feature film?
Pff...it already took NIST 6 years to disprove its own theory once...in 20 years I suspect they'll have yet a new theory that disproves their current theory....talk about not having a theory at all...You have yet to present any possible credible theory. Indeed, no theory at all.
Try the majority of the American public...Swung to what? A cottage industry of nutters and a bad feature film?
...perhaps if you were better at proving your case, the nuttery would end...Yes, with real men of action like you and mouse, I really see things happening in the truther movement in the future
Not at all. You never actually read any explanations I post. You simply change the subject and hope everyone forgets I posted it.
Ramdom Guy went through the trouble of providing links to many quite helpful sites when it comes to 9/11 research, and I doubt you have explored those at all. You already have your mind made up -- even though you won't say what you think really happened on 9/11.
He won't?
Is this related to the *no theory* motif you alluded to in another thread?
Oh yeah. Asking a truther what he thinks is the truth is the easiest way to shut down any 9/11 thread.
Are they pussies withholding unpopular views, or just modestly trying to cover up their ignorance -- or both -- in your view?
I figure they know anything they might come up with will be pretty easily picked apart, but that just makes me wonder why they don't even bother to check out whatever germ of a theory they may have to see if it's even possible -- for their own satisfaction if nothing else. Maybe they find the idea of a conspiracy so attractive that they would rather carry around that vague notion than do anything that could threaten it.
Not bothering to check guy?
Check.
Flirts with conspiracies guy?
Rampant.
That guy posts here every day.
I dunno. The loose change asshats are slowly backing away from the controlled demolition nonsense because they know that is one of the weakest bits of their arguments.
The fact that they went for it at all in the first place says something rather important about the lack of intellectual rigor involved.
WTC7 demolition theories are just as stupid as the ones about the other buildings, and, in time, will die the cold and lonely death of all ty conspiracy theories.
Pretty much.
Ask anybody with the conspiracy chip on their shoulder to flesh it out, and they pretty much start giving you a big load of ignore.
On some level they subconsciously refuse to really logically examine the underlying requirements for their theories to be true.
This is because, if one looks at just about any theory, one has to add more and more assumptions and co-conspirators, geometrically increasing the implausibility to the point where Occams Razor kicks in with vengeance.
I once tried to flesh out how many people it would take to say, fake all the moon landings and cover that up, and came up with thousands, if not tens of thousands of people with first-hand, direct knowledge, yet magically not one of these people has ratted the thing out.
Humans aren't that good at keeping secrets, that works against such conspiracies.
That is really the underlying reason, I think. Conspiracy adherents know on some level, just how weak their theories are, and their refusal to address those weak points is simply a manifestation of confirmation bias and the persistance of belief.
that is what I wonder as well
Loose change!
I saw that on YouTube!
NBAdan doesn't believe any of this stuff. It's just more poo to fling at the other sideline. All in the game.
Remember the "plane pods" in the 1st edition?
More like Random-Chump likes to put the cart before the horses...he himself has admitted to thinking that the Bush Administration failed its job to protect the homeland from Jan 01 - Sept 12, 01..
There are many levels of conspiracy theory here, for instance, the hardest Bush supporter would think that Random-Chump himself is a conspiracy theorist for thinking the Bush Administration acted any way other than valiantly on 911...
Alex Jones should have been the dead give-away..
....still unexplained are the various explosions reported by sources in WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 on lower floors before any of the tower collapsed...explosions that can be heard on recordings....
.....the Bush-faith crowd is just as guilty of glossing over facts that don't fit into their theory as 9/11 truthers...
That would be silly... you know, like thinking you can extend unemployment benefits with TARP money...
That isn't a conspiracy theory.
(watch this guys)
So dan, what do you think really happened on 9/11?
Are youtube videos allowed?
You can't use your own words?
I didn't ask what some dumbass who made a YouTube believes -- and they never have a theory either.
Post, in your own words, what you believe really happened on 9/11.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
