Sure, but time travel isn't exactly difficult to write into the script anymore. The benefit of returning to 2004 is that it was before these characters encountered the island. So if they wanted to go back to the way things were then it makes sense they would want to go back to 2004 (or before).
That would be a fine ending, but I just don't think it's the Lost way. You know there will be a big reveal/twist in the final episode and it just seems inevitable that we're going to find out the two timelines are chronologically linked.My theory is that the FS is just showing that no matter what, you are who you are. Jack isn't a serial killer. Kate isn't a housewife. Sayid isn't a gay fashion designer. There are some small differences, but everyone has close to the same life they had in the "real" timeline, right down to Kate being a fugitive for murder, and Claire getting preggers at the same exact time. Jack married and divorced, but we don't know he didn't do that before, do we? He has a kid, but he seems to be substantially the same person. They all do.
We'll see. That's what makes this fun.
Definitely agree only a few will be left standing at the end. Maybe the reason FS Jack doesn't remember the island is that he died.I also think that few, if any, of the principles will survive. Finding out that the creators are fans of The Stand means there will be blood. Of the permanent committee of seven in the book, I think two survived.




Reply With Quote

