That chick has a nice hand.
Do you have your couple Laker paragraphs saved and just change the names occasionally cause it's the same ole shtick. You cannot even compliment a good game by Kobe without making it all about showing your obsessive banality.
I said it was a great game, didn't I?..I don't understand what you want..
Do you disagree that it sucks that the Lakers have had to rely on Kobe to win 6 or 7 games for them on game winners?..I know you're a Laker fan and not just a Kobe fan, so I would assume that you would rather see your team dominating like they're supposed to..
Nope Melo record was 5 just saw it on ESPN ...nice try though Kobe has made the most in the last 5 seasons ...
They can win by 1 or 30... I could care less.
What I want? I don't want anything thank you. I was just pointing out how you continue the same shtick over and over.
And no... I cannot say as I have ever walked away from any Laker victory on a last second shot and said.... "God that really sucked".
What's my "shtick"?..
Rather close win than loss Lakers playing on cruise controlstillhave 3 game lead on West ...Dallas going to face a war vs Denver Round 2 if that cant pas us for #1 seed.
Also NBATV guys agree Dwill best PG dunk on Rose was sick .
They also said depite numbers his jumpshot is better than Rose or CP3 ...
I know Paul has better 3pt FG but he has NEVR been the better jumpshooter ...
Paul shoots more jump shots AND he has a better jump shot %..I don't know what other kind of proof you would need..he also shoots the majority of his jump shots off the dribble, while Williams gets most of them assisted(55% of them)..
Please refer to The Machine's post on the previous page.
So my "shtick" is that I'm also Chris Richards?..
using 2 periods instead of 3 on your never ending ellipses?![]()
Your shtick is to rag on the Lakers and Kobe ad nauseam. You cannot even make a simple compliment without tossing in your veiled jabs. You are obviously obsessed with the Lakers and even more so Kobe and it shows in the volume of your posts and their content.
Can I spell it out any clearer for you?
So my "shtick" is that I hate hate the Lakers and Kobe?..
Facts don't matter with Williams supporters.
Chalk it up as another one that the refs handed to the Lakers. Raptors up going into the fourth when all of a sudden the Lakers mysteriously appear at the line about ten times in the span of two minutes. On one, Bryant out of control runs into the lane and throws himself into the Raptor, on another Bryant's in the post, turns, Wright's arms are straight up, yet he's called for the foul. On a few others, I don't even know where the "foul" occurred.
Worst of all, not a thing about this was surprising. In fact, with 1:15 to go in the 3rd, I told my brother how the remainder of the game would unfold. Sure enough, I had it down to a tee. It's predictable. After all, the league couldn't have the Lakers lose their fourth straight, as their stranglehold on the West shrinks by the day. They're already not going to have home court in the finals, they can't have them not having it in the conference finals because then they might actually lose and not make the finals and that would be a major loss in ratings and that's what it's all about because it's sure as not about credibility.
Your hating the Lakers and Kobe is not a "shtick". That is your obsession.
Main Entry: ob·ses·sion
1 : a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often unreasonable idea or feeling; broadly : compelling motivation
2 : something that causes an obsession
Your "shtick" is having to post about your obsession and saying the same crap over and over and over.
Main Entry: shtick
1 : a usually comic or repe ious performance or routine
2 : one's special trait, interest, or activity
Clear enough?
"Ellipsis (plural ellipses; from the Greek: ἔλλειψις, élleipsis, "omission") is a mark or series of marks that usually indicate an intentional omission of a word or a phrase from the original text. An ellipsis can also be used to indicate a pause in speech, an unfinished thought, or, at the end of a sentence, a trailing off into silence (aposiopesis) (apostrophe and elipsis mixed). The ellipsis calls for a slight pause in speech.
The most common form of an ellipsis is a row of three periods or full stops (...) or pre-composed triple-dot glyph (…). The usage of the em dash (—) can overlap the usage of ellipsis.
The triple-dot punctuation mark is also called a suspension point, points of ellipsis, periods of ellipsis, or colloquially, dot-dot-dot."
Because he is "assisted" means he ACTUALLY gives up the ball ...the Hornets should try it sometime...
So against Derek Rose HONESTLY many on here would rather have Paul?
Neither guy can stay with Rose quickness wise but at least Dwill will not get bullied by him or Billups ...
No matter what your mom or wife tells you SIZE matters ...
I am not a WIlliams supporter ...jus ching the game with my eyes ...not while looking at boxscore
Plus I love playing devil's advocate many annointed him (paul) the best PG in the game we will see ...
Save this thread Williams will end up with the BETTER Career ...write it down, take a picture put in BOLD letters ...
Many cry that injury stuff Dwill was hurt last year and he still won more playoff games ...
I'm not asking you to apologize for it, but at least acknowledge it. I'm so sick of Lakers fans pretending it's not there. What was my vested interest in this game? I'm not a Raptors fan and even though I'd prefer if they beat the Lakers, I don't really care. The Lakers are locked into the first seed in the West and the second best record in the league. It's not changing, so really, I didn't have much of a rooting interest. I'm just telling you what I saw and what I saw was both predictable and pathetic.
Durant & D.Will will look god damn good in purple & gold in 5 years..cant wait
Kobe game winner...
http://www.nba.com/video/games/laker...nba/index.html
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)