Reply With Quote
Then you're an idiot. lol brainwashed by Hitler.
Actually, my entire argument is me being a Spurs fan. But you've been missing the point all along.
Then you're an idiot. lol brainwashed by Hitler.
They were the same caliber of team. If Fisher doesn't make that shot, Game 7 is in San Antonio, a game the Spurs were certainly CAPABLE of winning. We don't know for 100% certain how that series would've turned out if Fisher missed, but we do know that San Antonio was CAPABLE of winning that series and a le that year.
That's why you don't know what it takes to win a championship. Intangibles make your team better.
And what sort of intellectual ability does that grant you?
So is that why Fisher's shot went in? Because the Spurs were not capable of winning a le?
That series was defined by our inability to make 3 pointers. Which pretty much has decided every series between the Spurs and Lakers since Jackson coached the Lakers.
Since he watched them win 4 rings (even though I watched the 1999, 2003, 2005, and 2007 finals as well) he somehow knows more.
you would be nuts if you think the Mavs have a decent chance this season. Maybe they will get their chance in 2-3 season but it ain't coming so soon as this season IMHO. Those gots are ecstatically pandered to their mirage of being "stacked", totally getting themselves blinded to the truth that they ain't that good as they think. Your backcourt is now sturdy and deep as well as the C, but you have no cover for Dirk which may ineluctably force him to play 43+ mins a game come playoffs, once Dirk is raddled or injured the Mavs are fatefully done.
We lost the series in game 6. We had a chance after that shot. They were simply the better team.
Well this thread sure has blossomed since I saw it last.
No one is saying they have a "decent" chance. The question is whether or not they have a chance. According ElNazi, the Mavs have never been capable of winning a le.
To recognize when a team is championship caliber.
They haven't. Do you agree?
Intangibles are abstract qualities that can't be measured, which means we have no way of determining which teams have sufficient quan ies of things like leadership, heart, determination and unselfishness and which teams don't. You can't tell me which teams possess "intangibles" in sufficient quan ies and which teams don't.
No, being capable of winning a le and winning a le are two different things.
Were the Nazis championship caliber when your country gave them a safe haven?
Sure I can. Dallas doesn't have it. Lakers do. Denver, since they signed Chauncey do. Orlando doesn't, but they make up for it with Howard being a beast. Same for Cleveland and Lebron.
The Spurs were one miracle shot from having a Game 7 at home. They were a miracle shot away from being 3-0 at home over the Lakers in that series. So you're telling me that they weren't CAPABLE of winning a home game against the Lakers?
Every team has a chance for championship in your opinion. any given team just has to outplay 29 other better teams at most.
Prove it. How much of "it" do you need? And when it comes to things like being a late-game manager, basketball IQ, and an alpha dog personality, there's nothing that Chauncey Billups has that Jason Kidd doesn't. Whether that means Denver or Dallas will win a le this season, that has yet to be determined.
I wouldn't know. I was born after World War II.
Were the Nazis championship caliber when your country gave them a safe haven?
How about you? Was o championship caliber when he was gassing your family?
Spurfan is the only group who knows what "it" is. We wouldn't understand, we never watched a group of people we've never met win a ring!
Boxscore says we were not capable.
wait a minute, so if i was a part of a state championship basketball team, does that mean i have "it?"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions