It's been five or six games since his last one, so he's due, isn't he?
I hate when Bogans has games like this because it just gives Pop even more incentive to continue playing him(which is VERY dangerous since Bogans is the most inconsistent player on the team). Keith has all the signs of someone that's going to choke hard come playoff time.
nice 5 turnovers
overrated idiot
I hate Bogans, but damn, the guy busted his ass there tonite. Gz for him, hope he keeps it up -but i doubt it-.
bogans with a solid game out there... all that is asked of him.... bust his ass on d and hit a couple big shots.
bogans definitely is the better option over mason... which isnt saying much.. but masons pt just needs to go to hairston completely.
Why is it when a guy looks good, and the spurs win, he busted his ass and when they lose and he doedsn't do much, he's just a bust?
Spurs trapping LeBron worked really well. But because the Cavs master cutter, Varejao, only played 15 minutes. Varejao is the reason why most teams these days rarely trap LBJ.
Good game tonight for Bogans, he made some key 3s and fronted Jamison well..hopefully he does it more often, I'll give him credit for tonight, but we've done this many times..he needs to put a string of good games together..since Pop is going to play him no matter what, he needs to play better on a consistent basis, I really hope he can..
spurs still without tony parker.
Very nice game by Bogans
Huh? So?
So we can trade him!
Yeah!
talkin about the "spurs won but the cavs were with out master cutter varejeo" lmao wtf kind of excuse is that
Excuse? Grow up.
You're a turd.
what? lol
1 - Why would I make excuses for the Cavs? Couldn't care less about excuses.
2 - Unlike 99% of the Spurs fans in this board I've been saying since December that the Spurs are underrated and that they're still a top team in the league. Ditto for Manu - I predicted he'd come back at his best level this season when pretty much everybody was saying he was finito. Why would I be dissing the Spurs.
3 - So it wasn't an excuse. It was a ing basketball observation. I don't care much for what teams are playing. It could be the Celtics, the Lakers, whatever, I'd have said the exact same thing. It was a good observation, btw. If Varejao gets injured, it's much easier to flood the strongside vs. the Cavs as Popovich did today. Hickson can do some damage, like he did today (do you know how many points per possession he scored when flashing the post? Of course you don't, you're a bum), but he isn't Varejão. The Spurs won because Manu outplayed LBJ AND because Pop outcoached Brown.
kind of hard to observe all of the above when you post one liners like " spurs played good d but were only effective since varejeo was out" of course i realize how valuable varejeo is to cleveland and how good he is not just offensively but defensively as well... all i was stating was that us not having tony parker pretty much canceled out anything having to do with varejeo and how much of a "quality" win this is...
now go back to the celtic board or nba talk or whatever and gtfo. because when you come to a SPURS forum posting like that your obviously going to get a response out of somebody...... bum.
mogro is a respected poster here and he always shows love to the Spurs..he's not a troll, I don't see anything wrong with what he said..misunderstanding..
How? Would he be defending Varejao cuts? Or LBJ? What's the relevance of Tony Parker's absence for this particular issue?
Tony Parker being out is an entirely separate issue. Like the Cavs missing Shaq. Like Hill missing easy shots. Etc. Parker would be vital for the Spurs to beat the Cavs in a 7 games series, especially playing the high ballscreen versus their slow or stupid interior defenders, but I don't think that's particularly relevant for an analysis of this game. It may be relevant for the smack-talk department but, once again, I don't care about that, I wasn't talking about that and, to sum it up, I don't give a damn.
Sush.
I was under the impression that you were degrading the quality of the win because varejeo didn't play.... so i simply stated the fact tony didnt play...
that was all. Obviously that wasn't the case. so drop it.
DesignatedT trying to look like a badass. Lol.
mogrovejo is right though. he's the only poster I know that knew the Bucks were gonna be good this year.
look like a badass? why because im trying to defend my post after somebody called me a bum?
All right, congrats for a good win.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote