Reply With Quote
....still waiting on proof of anyone ever calling Garnett the best player in the world. Especially considering he was playing in the same era as Shaq, Kobe, and Duncan.
What's so funny? do you really think that the Celts win the championship with Dirk instead of KG?
....still waiting on proof of anyone ever calling Garnett the best player in the world. Especially considering he was playing in the same era as Shaq, Kobe, and Duncan.
Do I really think you are a nazi sympathizer? yes.
Since when MVP= best player in the world?
.....yeah, that's what I thought. Nothing to backup another bull statement.
Game's on!
Great comeback,how old are you? ... 12, 13?
The same time as when KG was thought of as the best player in the world.
Coincidence that two posters posted the same thing at the same time, I guess we both made the same up just for the sake of arguing.
I don't feel like looking for 10/8 years old articles, if you want proof you can look for it yourself.
Last edited by DAF86; 03-29-2010 at 07:47 PM.
Considering Anthony Peeler wasn't even on the 2004 Timberwolves, picc84's opinion of 2004 Garnett isn't what one would deem "credible".
Yeah, I'm sure that KG beign the 3rd wheel of that team is the reason why he was 3rd in MVP voting behind Kobe and CP3.Paul Pierce and Ray Allen had alot more to do with winning that championship than Garnett did. If you're asking Dirk to be a 3rd wheel like KG was, he can more than fill that role.
Just answer the question: Do you think that the Celtics would have won the 'ship that year with Dirk instead of KG?
Sweet, another Dirk-v-KG thread.
Considering the argument was about the 2003 team, you don't really have a clue wtf you're talking about.
Sometimes the MVP winner happens to be the best player in the world, most of the times they aren't and you should know it.
Besides I don't think that KG was ever the best player in the world at any particular moment, I'm just stating the fact that a lot of people did think that.
So that's your proof KG > Dirk, "a lot of people thought he was the best player in the world at the time of his MVP"?
Nevertheless the dude who got the finals MVP was not named Kevin Garnett.
IMO, KG = Dirk < Duncan. I don't think there's a way you can argue one was noticeable better than the other.
Does this ring a bell?
and then 10 min later
No that's just part of the argument, I think that KG > Dirk just because he's the better player.
Dirk: One of the best shooters of all-time, good at drawing fouls, great scorer. But he isn't particulary good at making teammates better and his defense is bad (and I'm beign generous), doesn't get the amount of rebounds a guy with his size and minutes should get.
KG: Better passer, leader, rebounder, blocker, stealer, defender than Dirk. And even though he isn't as good as Dirk on offense, he still is (or was) an elite player on that end too.
And in 2007 Parker got finals MVP over Duncan.
Yeah but difference is KG didn't get it because he wasn't able to (not then, maybe not ever).
I'm not the one who made some ridiculous ing statement that basketball "specialists" called KG the best player in the world. YOU are the dumb who made that claim, and the burden of proof is on YOU.
Get back to me when you can prove what you said. Until then, keep your stupid ing bull claims to yourself.
Strangely enough, most of the time, they are spearheaded by one of spurstalk's manufans.
I know that "KG beign arguably the best player in the world" was discussed during those years, I don't need to look it up, I remember it. If you don't, then look it up for yourself. I'm not trying to prove anything to you, I couldn't care less if you bealive me or not.
No, they're spearheaded by delusional Mavsfans that think that Dirk had a better career than Garnett.
BTW Which Manufan was the one that started the argument on this case? FINDOG or HarlemHeat?
No matter that you're losing badly, this argument is really important to you isn't it?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
