rofl of course we do against the lakers he is unguardedable because the corpse of Derek Fisher will be guarding him.
its the only clear advantage the spurs have against them
rofl of course we do against the lakers he is unguardedable because the corpse of Derek Fisher will be guarding him.
its the only clear advantage the spurs have against them
Last edited by BanditHiro; 04-04-2010 at 05:33 PM.
Parker is just gravy. we could win the championship w/out him![]()
hmm. so it's bad to beat the Lakers, Cavs, Magic and Celtics?
Thought Parker's interview w/ what's-her-black-face was unusual.
Wouldn't at all surprise me if TP's startin to get nervous.
When nkdlunch agrees with you, it's safe to assume you're not on the right side of an argument.
Hmm. So it's bad to have an all-star PG that's able to put 20 ppg and 6 assts while shooting 50% from the field?
The recent surge has more to do with Ginobili being 100% again(first time in two years) and playing some of the best ball of his career.
if we could get a star young big for him i think they should do it.
Good point. There are so many star young bigs on the trading block...and george hill has proven he can run the offense. I don't see any reason not to do it. Well, the Spurs would have to try to find a young star PG, but other than that i can't see any reason not to do it.
Maybe they can trade the star young big they get for a star young PG. That would be ideal.
you're a ing idiot
it is if his presence makes your team worse. just ask teams that have had Allan Iverson the past few years.
and you must not be a Spurs fan.
Iverson never shot anywhere near 50%. Parker doesn't make the team worse, his game just doesn't mesh well with Jeff.
Worst thread of the year candidate... good job... you may win it all after the nominations!![]()
this thread sucks.
Just re ed pure hate by some spoiled ungrateful fans.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)