Reply With Quote
So you still won't answer my question.
Instead, you'll just whine about your failure to comprehend it.
Understood.
Dude, I already awnsered your question. You don't have to use the mandated insurance, but you do have to pay for it regardless whether you use it or not. I have a problem with being forced to pay for it in the first place.
So you still won't answer my question.
Instead, you'll just whine about your failure to comprehend it.
Understood.
No, you didn't.
You see, gtown, there are people who will still not have insurance.
Will they be forbidden to pay out of pocket?
Yes or no.
So now that i answered your question, are you saying that we should be ok with Obamacare because it doesn't force us to use the insurance we paid for?
Yes, those people are called the congress and staffers, who are exempt from Obamacare.
Great Bill!
I'm not saying you should be anything.
I'm fine with letting the courts decide the cons utionality of the mandate. I can see arguments for both sides.
No, not those people.Yes, those people are called the congress and staffers, who are exempt from Obamacare.
Great Bill!
Think harder, if you can.
You mean to tell us that we have the right to tip doctors with Obamacare! yippy!!!!!
thanx Chump, you're full of wisom!
No, once again you've failed to understand.
It's OK. I'm used to it.
Jackass question deserves a jackass response. thanx!
Yeah, those other people will have their freedom so long as they stay below the poverty line. What's your point?
It's ok, you failed to ask a relevant question.
It's ok, I expect it.
why are you evading this question chump?
It's quite relevant, and you still haven't answered it.
So, you don't understand that?
Typical.
Tell me what part you didn't understand.
I understand the content of your question but don't understand the point of your question.
Why are you intent on asking whether we are banned from paying out of pocket? No one is griping because of that. We are griping because we have to pay for mandated insurance.
So again, what is the point of these questions, are these questions designed for you to claim cheap victories?
You were.Do you? Is there something else that can be done?We are griping because we have to pay for mandated insurance.
No, they've pretty much illustrated that you are fairly ignorant of the issues and should just stick with personal insults and trolling.So again, what is the point of these questions, are these questions designed for you to claim cheap victories?
,
like i said, there was no point to any of your questions that had to do with policy, they were just for cheap victories.
Not at all. There are real answers to them. Showing just how ignorant you are is a bonus and completely expected.
like i said, there was no point to any of your questions that had to do with policy, they were just for cheap victories.
You want a link to your own post that you already quoted?
i want a link were i said the govt is going to ban paying out of pocket like you asserted me saying.You want a link to your own post that you already quoted?
Do it.
Not at all. My question was quite clear.
Thanks for acknowledging your ignorance.
What a .
I asked you a question about it because I didn't know the answer.
You avoided it for awhile, then finally answered it (not that you actually looked anything up, you just guessed), now you are avoiding other questions to avoid looking even more ignorant.
It's OK. I already know you are ignorant.
self pwnage sprinkled with contradiction is awesome.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
