Reply With Quote
When I first read the le, I thought "vengeance against whom?"
The only game that irritated me in the '06 semis vs. Dallas was game 3. 50 FT for a jump shooting team? Really???
When I first read the le, I thought "vengeance against whom?"
the total FT counts are totally irrelevant. it doesnt tell you if they called them the same on both ends, or if they let everything go or were ticky tacky, or if they simply made 1-2 huge mistakes .
duncan should have shot freethrows at the end of regulation in game 7. it was just as much of a foul as manu on dirk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcUK8...eature=related
the logic that you dont end a series with a call is BS when thats exactly what allowed the mavs to tie in the first place.
and for the heat, cuban got what he deserved. he wanted a freethrow fest and his boys in blue lost, because they couldnt hit their freethrows vs an inferior team.
How old were you when the 2006 finals took place? 10? 12?
STFU got
good to know they are finally laughing about it. As the rest of the world has been laughing about it for 4 years
cool f'in story bro.
That probably has been said about 3 times already.
Nice try though got, you're hilarious
LOL u mad?
LOL read the thread son
LOL When will they ever learn. Waiting for the 2011 version of this.
Findog, poop is simply too dumb to accept it. In both series the Mavs had less FT's than the other team and Dirk had less FT's than Duncan/Wade. To say that the Mavs/Dirk were treated both times as the superior team is just bull . But what do you expect on a Spurs board?
I have no problem to say that this should have been a foul, I agree. But to say (like poop) the whole series was rigged in favour of the Mavs is just pure bull .
Yep
Wade was more agressive than jump-shooting Dirk
Last i checked Dirk missed his FT at the end of Game 3, and that would have made it 3-0 and the Mavs would have won the series
last i checked it was some bull officiating that even let the Heat back into the game and it should have been 3-0 regardless
It was the timeliness and questionable nature of the foul calls that initially bugged me about that series, not the amount.
However, by the end of game 7, I was so hopped up on bars and alcohol (to get me through the game) and a bowl or two (to get me past the game's outcome) that the whole thing is a bit of a dark void in my memory.
Yes well despite the "bull officiating" your star player still had a chance to ice it at the line, and he blew it.
not every superstar is 100% from the line over their careers, like Tim Duncan
Well in Tim Duncan's defense, he actually has to make a jumpshot to end the game.
No it would have tied the game and sent it to OT.
Seriously, what is with Spurfan trying to talk and getting it all wrong?
I'm assuming as esl you mean english second language. Nothing could be further from the truth. See i was referring to Dirk winning games at the ft line, and Duncan wining games making jumpshots. I can't recall Duncan getting a whistle under 30 seconds of a playoff game, and it not bein intentional
I strongly believe Mavs would have won that game ala game 7.
what is it with spur fans and selective memory?
I strongly believe you're a cheese but it doesn't change the fact that Dirk wasn't shooting FT's to win the game.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
