OK, as stupid as some of these demonstrations are going to be (standing across the river from DC and I guess waving one's guns), I can understand the motivation behind the Second Amendment march.
What I don't understand is the date. Did these guys go out of their way to schedule this on Monday, April 19? Do they really want to be seen as commemorating this double anniversary?
OKC bombing.
Waco fire.
Big deal. We can't just bite our tongues while the government tramples all over the Cons ution. It's not an armed march, either. We also have strict guidelines when speaking to the press, meaning we won't let you play "gotcha!" with us. If you don't like our right to bear arms, come and take them from us!
Whoa, am I the only who didnt expect that kind of response? So obviously youre apart of the rally.OKC bombing.
Waco fire.
Big deal. We can't just bite our tongues while the government tramples all over the Cons ution. It's not an armed march, either. We also have strict guidelines when speaking to the press, meaning we won't let you play "gotcha!" with us. If you don't like our right to bear arms, come and take them from us!
"the government tramples all over the Cons ution"
You Lie
I think that was a setup for the picture.
What Chump said. Except I was serious about it being an unarmed march, I do a little research from time to time.
But really, am I really losing my touch?
In a sense, it means you are getting better.What Chump said.
Am I really losing my touch?
Right over your head.........
again.....
Seems like a very poor choice of anniversaries to march on. Bizarre.
Blame Matt Groening.
Why blame him?
Why not?
Because there is no reason to do so.
I would blame the organizers of the event.
Tell us more.
Certainly.
It's not the best of ideas to commemorate events surrounding child rapist cult leaders and domestic terrorists.
And that has nothing to do with The Tracey Ullman Show.
Does that clear it up for you?
Why did they choose this day?
That is what this thread is about.
Do you understand that?
Sorry I didn't see it before. FAIL THREAD
So you failed to see it.
Why do you say that?FAIL THREAD
'crickets'
You posted in it seven times, and probably will again.
And while I would be interested to read a serious rationale for the timing from someone on the right, I'm not sure I'm going to get one. Their silence is a response in itself.
I'll wait with you.
So you are interested in reading an explanation.
No doubt. Someone will weigh in soon.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
