Reply With Quote
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/27...es-10-injured/
Plenty more humans where that came from Yoni.
Baby boy survives for nearly two days after abortion
The le of the article speaks for itself.
Last edited by Yonivore; 04-28-2010 at 08:18 PM. Reason: To help Duff make better decisions.
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/27...es-10-injured/
Plenty more humans where that came from Yoni.
where in the article does someone suggest that a fetus 5 1/2 months along is just a piece of tissue?
He's just doing it for attention, it's better just to ignore him.
Oh Yoni you're treading a fine line here, the Obama regime has designated pro lifers domestic terrorists.
It probably doesn't but, I've heard that argument enough to know it's one justification used to kill the unborn.
So, what's the justification for this?
Should the doctor be punished for not murdering the baby in proper fashion?
I think I fit a couple dozen administration definitions for subversion.
And a million definitions for asshole.
So then what's the point of your le? Like I said, it's just for attention as all your posts are. Making outrageous claims in order to shock everyone.
Is there anyone in particular that has stated that a 22 month old baby is just tissue or are you playing straw man?
I'm not sure there is a justification for aborting a 22 month old baby just because he might have a disability.
It sounds like the authorities are properly pissed off.
Okay, just forget the tissue comment. I was merely lumping all pro-abortionists into one big stinky pile -- where they belong.
Yeah, that he didn't kill the baby properly -- not that an unborn child was subjected to a horrific procedure and left for dead.
Hey..I resemble that remark.
As if the story weren't shocking enough? Seriously!
Yeah, probably in the same dictionary.
But, I'm not a baby-killer.
So then let the story speaks for itself. Again I don't see the point of you making baseless claims. As Blake and anyone who's read it has seen, that no one in the article claims it's just a piece of tissue.
I invite you to quit reading my posts. I'm not likely to change based on your input.
I'm not calling you out so you can change. I'm calling you out to make you look like a jackass, which quite frankly, is proving not that difficult.
Well, good for you. Have fun with that.
I figured that was probably the case.
Yeah, that he didn't kill the baby properly -- not that an unborn child was subjected to a horrific procedure and left for dead.This part is confusing. Is it possible for the doctors to determine if the fetus can live separately from the mother while inside the womb?“The minister of health will send inspectors to the hospital in Rossano Calabro to investigate what actually happened, and to see if the Law 194, which prohibits abortion when there is a possibility of the foetus living separately from the mother, and permits it only when the continuation of the pregnancy would result in life-threatening danger to the mother.”
More importantly, is it possible doctors could just quit killing the unborn?
if the mother's life is at risk, I'm ok with aborting the fetus.
Well, you've described a small number of the millions of abortions performed every year.
How do you feel about the others?
depends on the cir stances mostly.
In this particular cir stance, I don't like the idea that the baby was aborted at 22 months just because the mother found out it might be disabled.
So, are you willing to sit in an office somewhere and pass judgment on every abortion?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
