cool. which one is you?
Originally Posted by Blake
I don't see any philosophical problems with believing time existed before God.
You are assuming God has been around forever.
cool. which one is you?
?uoy si eno hcihw .looc
This topic was interesting until you ran mouse off.
nobody ran you off.
feel free to post your predictable response.
Couldn't resist a good-natured poke in the ribs. I love anyone who can argue about dark matter, astrophysics, and quantum mechanics.
We'll have to have a beer sometime.
What happened to this thread? It was supposed to be about human evolution, not the origins of the universe?!![]()
The one thing I can't stand about the multiverse theory is its inherent untestability. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the theory goes that every quantum decision is played out in infinite worlds that have no way of contacting each other... how do you falsify such a theory?
I can't argue any of that. I have an extremely casual working knowledge of that stuff and would much rather read what real experts theorize about it.
I'm more of the philosophical sort.![]()
If I am so predictable why not answer the questions I ask?
your questions are almost always answered as quickly as you post.
I'm still waiting for Mouse to explain this...
When I was born, I was 20 inches long. By 2, I was 36 inches long/high.
Given this math, we can see that I should grow roughly 16 inches every 2 years, or 8 inches a year.
I am 28 now, so that means I should be: 20 +8X = Y, where X = 28, means Y = 244 inches tall, divided by 12 equals...
20 feet, 4 inches.
I mean, you can't argue with that math. That's Mouse logic!
If NASA and many Scientist have already confirmed the moon drifts away from earth at about maybe four inches a year how many years would you have to go back in order to put the moon four inches from the Earth?
When I was born, I was 20 inches long. By 2, I was 36 inches long/high.
Given this math, we can see that I should grow roughly 16 inches every 2 years, or 8 inches a year.
I am 28 now, so that means I should be: 20 +8X = Y, where X = 28, means Y = 244 inches tall, divided by 12 equals...
Why aren't I 20 feet, 4 inches tall?
So your answer is?
You see cuz this is not my first age of earth debate...... I have some that make you want to change your facebook page. ....This is kinda a subject poster's may say ..."I rule",....in,........but, hey!..,....... It's really your call
I guess.
How tall does a banana tree have to grow to produce bananas?
Your romper room style of debating will only increase the pain of my huge greasy reply that will leave you listening to Rick Ashley for the next 6 days.
it's your ass, do ass you wish,,,,
I saw it happen...........
![]()
Last edited by mouse; 04-29-2010 at 09:01 PM.
you are assuming the moon has been drifting away from the earth at a constant speed over the years. It hasn't been.
where do you get your questions from?
It's a simple question Mouse... why can't you answer it?When I was born, I was 20 inches long. By 2, I was 36 inches long/high.
Given this math, we can see that I should grow roughly 16 inches every 2 years, or 8 inches a year.
I am 28 now, so that means I should be: 20 +8X = Y, where X = 28, means Y = 244 inches tall, divided by 12 equals...
Why aren't I 20 feet, 4 inches tall?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
They confirmed that by using lasers bounced back from reflectors put there by the Apollo astronauts during their landings, something else you don't believe happened.
oooh the if only this irony could get the wrinkles out of my shirts.
This question makes the same factually incorrect assumptions that your "Niaga falls" question did, namely that the rate it is drift is the same as in the past.
For someone who levels blanket criticisms at science for speculating about things that happened a long time ago, this is yet another helping of irony.
I always answer your questions. What are you talking about?
Yet, you never seem to bother answering mine directly.
When you posted pictures of the "40 year old" stalac es as proof that all stalac es had to be very young, I went out and found a an actual scientist who specifically mentioned the chemistry involved in those formations as compared to the normal cave formations.
Have you found any of your creationist websites that talk about the chemistry of those 40 year old stalac es yet mouse?
The ones that I found in my google search invariably didn't talk at all about the chemistry involved in the formation of such young stalac es, versus what takes place in natural caves. If you want, I can repeat the search, and provide links.
MY QUESTION STILL STANDS, AND YOU STILL HAVE NOT ANSWERED IT.
Are those websites ignorant of the actual chemistry/science involved in the formation of natural cave stalac es, or are they deliberately withholding the information in their presentation, what do you think mouse?
Seriously Dude I think your mistaking me for someone else, that, or else you don't have a good memory.
First off I never said the moon does not have reflectors on it, in fact I told you all many times the USSR had already sent an "unmanned" rover to the moon to leave a reflector plates and to gather soil samples.
So go back and "re-read" the NASA debate topics and make sure you know where I stand before you make anymore false assumptions on your part.
![]()
I do apologize if the time chart on the rate your body grows doesn't interest me.
Age of earth, Nasa, 9/11,Evolution, those are the topics I wish to debate. maybe you can find a self help support forum that can answer the many human bodily functions and the rate they developed questions you need answered.
good luck!
Payaso.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)