MVP of the series?

[DAF86]

To me it was McDyess, by far the most consistent player during the entire series, affected the game in many ways (on the defensive end, on the offensive boards, and with his mid-range jumper). He played as well as you could have expected from him.

[RedRaider]

McDyess had some really good mid range jumpers and was a beast defensively. I'd give it to either him or George Hill. Hill wasn't completely consistent, but he was a huge factor in a few of the games, which obviously the Mavs weren't ready for. Tim played well too.

[spursfan1000]

No doubt George Hill if it wasnt for him we would have not won this series, everyone else is expected to do good but Hill really showed up. My vote is Hill.

[DAF86]

No doubt George Hill if it wasnt for him we would have not won this series, everyone else is expected to do good but Hill really showed up. My vote is Hill.

McDyess was expected to do as well as he did?

[spursfan1000]

McDyess was expected to do as well as he did?

Well he did good but not as good as Hill.

[bus driver]

i think that was tough between hill and dice
but i picked hill because his meant more

[RedRaider]

No doubt George Hill if it wasnt for him we would have not won this series, everyone else is expected to do good but Hill really showed up. My vote is Hill.

Your sig is extremely distracting..

[sa_butta]

Really tough between Hill and Mcdyess, but I went with Hill

[nkdlunch]

very tough one. all those guys were the difference. I'd take TD because it all starts and ends with TD. His D and rebounding were the most important factor.

[spursfan1000]

Your sig is extremely distracting..

lol what is it? I have it on where I can't see the signatures.

[clambake]

carlisle

[Trainwreck2100]

rick carlisle

[spursfan1000]

carlisle

[Darkwaters]

I'm torn between Bogans or Mason as MVP of the series.

[DAF86]

Well he did good but not as good as Hill.

Hill was meh at best in three of the six games. Dice was solid during the entire series.

[spursfan1000]

Hill was meh at best in three of the six games. Dice was solid during the entire series.

Hill was the one that led us to win them three games...Dice just contributed in the series but not anything big, he did play well though.

[DAF86]

carlisle

Agreed but I wanted this to be a hard choice.

[Dice]

I'd give Hill and Dice co-MVP's. First couple of games Hill wasn't as much of a factor but came up big at the end. Dice was fairly solid the entire series except for the tank game.

[Pauleta14]

Pop

[Arrowch4]

No doubt George Hill if it wasnt for him we would have not won this series, everyone else is expected to do good but Hill really showed up. My vote is Hill.

This.

[The Gemini Method]

Jet

[Dex]

Dice and Hill both stepped up with big games, but they also had some pretty invisible ones as well.

Manu was the backbone for the Spurs this entire series. If it weren't for him, Spurs wouldn't have been in a single contest. Even if he wasn't scoring well, his leadership and presence on the floor steadied the team and he was always there with a big shot when it counted. Moreso than Tim or Tony, this series revolved around Manu.

[DAF86]

Hill was the one that led us to win them three games...Dice just contributed in the series but not anything big, he did play well though.

What three games? game 4 definitely and he was huge in the 4th quarter yesterday (not so much the rest of the game) but what other game are you talking about? That one where he scored 17 pts on 6 of 16 shooting with only one assist in 45 minutes?

[poop]

the ball

it went in

[DAF86]

Dice and Hill both stepped up with big games, but they also had some pretty invisible ones as well.

Manu was the backbone for the Spurs this entire series. If it weren't for him, Spurs wouldn't have been in a single contest. Even if he wasn't scoring well, his leadership and presence on the floor steadied the team and he was always there with a big shot when it counted. Moreso than Tim or Tony, this series revolved around Manu.

When??? He was even decent in game 5.