Anyway, there are tons of pics of WTC7 after the collapse...
Did it collapse South to you?
Anyway, there are tons of pics of WTC7 after the collapse...
Did it collapse South to you?
Thanks for that last one from the north. It show very clearly the north facade laying on top of the rubble.
Barclay Street looks relatively clear of debris in front of the Academy of Sciences building.
![]()
Ten minute YouTube!
That's way too long.
The way to destroy "truthers" is to ask them what they think really happened on 9/11.
I will demonstrate.
dan, what do you think really happened on 9/11?
Connecting the dots...
No dan, I didn't ask you to post twenty more minutes of YouTube bull .
I asked you this: What do you think really happened on 9/11?
Chumpdumper, how confident are you that 9/11 wasn't an inside job?
Quite so.
Would you bet your life on it? Are you that confident?
What would I get in return if I win the bet?
Truthers are stupid.
They cannot articulate why 9/11 was an inside job and who's behind it, how it got planned and executed, etc, etc, etc.
There are so many holes in their re ed theories, it is not even funny.
Truthers ares tupid.
How do we really know that isn't an inside job? It's been almost 10 years and we still do not have all the details about what happened on 9/11.
So dumper, are you willing to bet on your life that 9/11 was not an inside job? If you are that confident, then I will give you props but if not then I would say you're a pussy.
Personally, I would say I'm 50/50 on whether 9/11 was an inside job.
Which details are you personally lacking?
What would I win if I bet my life on it? Would you die? Or are you a pussy?So dumper, are you willing to bet on your life that 9/11 was not an inside job? If you are that confident, then I will give you props but if not then I would say you're a pussy.
Personally, I would say I'm 50/50 on whether 9/11 was an inside job.
Dumper, you win nothing. I guess the only thing you would win would be the satisfaction of being right if 9/11 was indeed proved to not be an inside job. So I will ask you again, are you willing to bet your life on 9/11 not being an inside job? How confident are you?
Were you there in NYC on 9/11? How do you know for sure what happened? Just sayin'.
Btw, I think you're kind of a pussy for not betting your life on this if you are so confident and right about 9/11. And no, I'm not a pussy.
Seems like a pussy argument to me.
The only way to refute this pile of ridiculousness is to go point by point. And that takes too long.
Rule 1: Conspiracies are based on the fact that what we know is "lies." we have been "lied" to.
Rule 2: The stuff that refutes the conspiracy, is there "lies." The "truth" is covered up.
How do you refute such logic? You can't.
Problem: the government does sometimes lie and cover stuff up. How do we know the difference?
Answer: Don't rely on the "lies" argument. Look at the evidence. Don't advocate a position before looking at the evidence and conveniently pick only the evidence that proves that position. Don't take something as "proven" when some facts are consistent with that and others are not.
the evidence I have seen so far for the "inside job" is refuted over and over again by knowledgeable experts with nothing to gain. This topic is an insult. I have no doubt that Bush did not mind wasting American lives in a stupid war for his own interests, but I just cannot see him (or whomever) blowing up a building with thousands of americans in it on American soil like that.
Oddly enough, none of those videos show show to cut vertical columns with thermite.
Nor does it calculate just how much thermite would be necessary to do what CT'ers posit. (answer is: a lot)
Nor does it provide any real evidence of the massive wiring required to put such a thing in place.
nor does it explain how thermite charges might have survived the shock of hundreds of tons of planes' impacting their columns at 500 mph and were fire-proof enough not to go off during the initial fires.
How do you "fire-proof" thermite charges Dan? Do those videos show that?
I guess that's one of the reasons for the Arizona legislation.
Then why should I make such a bet?
I said I was quite confident. There is no reason to bet my life on it. You are a pussy for not offering anything in return for my betting my life.So I will ask you again, are you willing to bet your life on 9/11 not being an inside job? How confident are you?
No.Were you there in NYC on 9/11?
It has been extensively do ented by people who were there.How do you know for sure what happened?
Just sayin' what? You haven't displayed any knowledge of the events of 9/11 whatsoever. You say "It's been almost 10 years and we still do not have all the details about what happened on 9/11." Well, what details are you lacking to assuage your su ions that 9/11 was an inside job. I find that most people who say things like that are merely ignorant and lazy; although some are simply liars. Which are you?Just sayin'.
You are absolutely a pussy for demanding a person bet that person's life while risking absolutely nothing yourself in return. That isn't how bets work, pussy.Btw, I think you're kind of a pussy for not betting your life on this if you are so confident and right about 9/11. And no, I'm not a pussy.
Now, let's talk about something we might actually be able to do something about: your ignorance.
What details about 9/11 are you missing?
if you don't list them, you are even more of a pussy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)