ive never seen someone put up those kind of numbers yet have no real impact on the game.
its actually amazing to see.
It was surreal. Another triple-double... almost a quadruple-double.
I don't deserve to lose because I have teammates. But such is life.
I'm gonna enjoy digging sand on the beach... again!
ive never seen someone put up those kind of numbers yet have no real impact on the game.
its actually amazing to see.
Stephon Marburry and Steve Francis had some truly fraudulent numbers throughout their careers. Assists that were selfish, points that did nothing other than pad stats.
LeBron's numbers are better, but he looked disinterested, and he looked like he had no explosiveness...
Yet despite the triple double, you still had a bad game. Watching, I had no idea you were even CLOSE to a trip/dub.
Shows #'s aren't everything.
It is kinda amazing.
Once I saw the numbers at the end of the game, I was like, "Wow, if I hadn't seen the game I would have thought he dominated."
What's funny is how similar his numbers were to the ones Rondo put up in Game 4, except Rondo completely controlled the game and Lebron didn't.
LOL @ these guys..
The numbers do tell you how he poorly he played..he shot a poor % and he had 9 turnovers..are those not numbers?..
Of course. But when people look at historic numbers, they're looking at the main ones (pts, reb, ast), not FG% and turnovers. Heck, they don't even have a stat for personal turnovers on the boxscore.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)