Reply With Quote
Thats why you don't trade Manu Ginobili for guys like him.
Sequ and Rascal.
How bout that Vince Carter!!!!
Thats why you don't trade Manu Ginobili for guys like him.
Sequ and Rascal.
Oh, I thought you were comparing him to RJ.
Pro-Manu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Pro-RJ
No flaming necessary.
?!?!
WTF
manu fouled in game 7 spurs vs mavs though late
I wish ur computers would get a virus.
I thought the Carter trade didn't include Manu...I would still take him over Jefferson.
The people I mentioned in the le wanted Manu traded for carter...
Carter and Jefferson are the same guy.
macs ahrdly get virus
I also removed virus from thousands of computers
so if I did get a virus I would not have to pay to get rid of it
VC can create a million times more than RJ can.
Carter would have been like Michael Finley on the Spurs.
Ummm..... no.
Do you think Carter would have done that much better than RJ with the Spurs?Ummm..... no.
Does it really matter what you can do from NOV to APR? They're both playoff fails, but at least we're stuck with RJ's smaller contract for two less years.
VC can create a million times more than RJ can.
Yeah hes such a huge creator come playoff time.
VC can create a million times more than RJ can.
Again, I stand by my statement.
The only difference between and Vince is doesn't hide his tendencies while Vince is on the down low.
I didn't say anything about contracts, failures, anything like that. I simply said VC could create more. Do you disagree?
Game 1: 2nd leading scorer
Game 2: Tied for 2nd leading scorer
(Boston series)
You've lost your mind if you think RJ can create equal to that of VC.
that sig...
id kill everyone in this thread just for the chance to sniff her ass.
Choked shot after shot and fts.
i agreed with the premises of the thread, which is that Manu>Vince. it's true, yet it's also easy for anyone toot their horn now that Manu isn't injured...
but the RJ>VC talk, which i guess is the tangent this thread has taken, is just plain stupid. Carter's ability to hit the three at a significantly higher rate than RJ would already make him a better fit for this system. that not even counting the fact that he's a better driver to the basket.
and chances are he wouldn't have had the opportunity to blow ft's if he was playing with the Spurs because in end-game situations like that either Tony or Manu would have had their numbers called before him.
all he would have had to do on the Spurs is stretch the floor (which he can do better than RJ) and score every once and while off of drives to take the pressure of Manu and Tony, which he can do better than RJ as well.
RJ does not equal VC. not in any system, including this one.
o damn, just noticed i was responding to Ericb's comments. i woulda never wasted my time with that post if i had looked at that before lmao. some people just aren't made to understand basic logic.
My point is that having Carter instead of RJ wouldn't have made the Spurs any better. So I rather have RJ that is a expiring next season.i agreed with the premises of the thread, which is that Manu>Vince. it's true, yet it's also easy for anyone toot their horn now that Manu isn't injured...
but the RJ>VC talk, which i guess is the tangent this thread has taken, is just plain stupid. Carter's ability to hit the three at a significantly higher rate than RJ would already make him a better fit for this system. that not even counting the fact that he's a better driver to the basket.
and chances are he wouldn't have had the opportunity to blow ft's if he was playing with the Spurs because in end-game situations like that either Tony or Manu would have had their numbers called before him.
all he would have had to do on the Spurs is stretch the floor (which he can do better than RJ) and score every once and while off of drives to take the pressure of Manu and Tony, which he can do better than RJ as well.
RJ does not equal VC. not in any system, including this one.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
