Reply With Quote
No one specifically called the FF terrorists ever.
You're right. It was my mistake to believe your direct response to his post was accurate in its assumptions. You clearly didn't understand what he was saying. You're really working those arms backpedaling though.I can't believe you'd waste your time with arguing when you don't know what the issue is, what the person you're arguing with's position on the issue is, or the angle he's taking with his actual argument.
You learn that at work?In other words, I can't believe you don't know that reading is fundamental.
No one specifically called the FF terrorists ever.
Oh really? Why do you insist on making blanket statements that are so ridiculous?
You backpedal with your arms? I use my feet, and that's actually the brake.
He's probably trying to say that no one has named specific founding fathers as terrorists. Oh wait, he's still probably wrong.
after the ridiculous blanket statement you made, that I've arguing as such this whole, the irony just seeps out of this post.
he didn't get it
I'm "probably" trying to say that if you're an idiot with no comprehension. I am definitely, 100% saying that, have been the whole thread.
Manny is either 1) misinformed or 2) wrong.
Let's bring this full circle. If you went up to random people on the street, what percentage would answer yes to this question:
"Did you know the founding fathers were considered terrorists in their day?"
You're thinking of a backstroke. Backpedaling implies steps or using your feet, since pedals are generally handled by your feet.
try again
That's your first post in the thread. You can try and change your argument all you want. Everyone knows you're lying. It does help to keep calling people names though.I am definitely, 100% saying that, have been the whole thread.
Prove it.Manny is either 1) misinformed or 2) wrong.
That's disingenuous as .Leading questions that are patently false your style, huh?
He still doesn't get it. Look I can't explain every joke to you. You'll have to figure this one out on your own.
That's disingenuous as .
I'm glad you responded. It shows that your assertion that you understood Manny's original post was false. Thanks for playing.
... and I'm still sticking by it. It's never been common knowledge the FF were terrorists, were considered terrorists, whatever phrasing and semantics you want to continue arguing, it will be wrong because you cannot possibly back up such a ridiculous statement.
So by me calling your question disingenuous and patently false, it means something about me? Try to focus on the subject at hand and not the person you're debating.
I'm glad you responded. It shows that your assertion that you understood Manny's original post was false. Thanks for playing.
It was stupid. Mainly because you don't backpedal with your arms.
THAT'S NOT WHAT MANNY SAID.
It's like talking to a wall. A wall that doesn't understand we can go back and look at his posts.
It's never been common knowledge they were considered terrorists, either. Continue arguing semantics.
It's like talking to a wall. A wall that doesn't understand we can go back and look at his posts.
It means you don't understand the basic premise of what Manny said.
THAT'S the joke smart guy.
Semantics
You took what Manny said, misinterpreted it, then tried to say you were merely making more than one point. You suck so bad at lying.
Not reading posts is better than reading and not understanding them.
Sure it was. You're just an idiot. Go argue about some posts you didn't read.
This is fun and all but we're just going in circles. It seems he'll never understand Manny's original post. Maybe when he admits as much I'll have something more to say.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
