Reply With Quote
Someone close this thread before the Laker trolls post anything here
No the Spurs would not have won the series against the Fake show, but we would have matched up better in my opinion. The Spurs would have slowed the game down more than the Suns are trying to do. I could see the Spurs losing in 6, not 4 like the Suns are about to do. What are yalls thoughts?
Someone close this thread before the Laker trolls post anything here
great thread.
the chances of it ending well for you are about the same as the Spurs chances of winning 2 games against the Lakers in a series.
Sorry bro, but the season is over. Does us know good to talk about what ifs.
no, they wouldn't. stop the mental fapping, and face reality.
The obvious difference are the bigs…Duncan plays defense & dose not give the opposition extra motivation…Everyone knows that Lamar Odom can be a bit “spacey”…Having Amare tweak Lamar in the press was a gift for the Lakers…
kind of like these what ifs after the boys got swept by the loosing suns
of course they would. Only because the Suns laid down and died at 1st quarter of game 1 of this series.
Im fielding this question because this is what was said on ESPN radio this morning. I tend to agree. *shrugs*
The Spurs Probably would have matched up Better.... but we Obviously dont Match Up well With PHX....0-4..... So lets not talk about the What Ifs, And what Could have Happened.... Season Over, Move on.
I think it is a fairly easy argument to make - basketball is a game of matchups - it is much harder to scheme away mismatches in bball than most other sports - I think that what was made 2006 so tough to take (for me more so than losing to Dallas or the nature of that series) is I truly believe the Spurs would have beat the Heat (matchup much better than Dallas inside and With Bowen still able to be elite defender).
So yeah Spurs would of played Lakers tougher - still would of lost series - but thats the way it goes
No, the Spurs would of been ed. Duncan can't defend both Gasol + Bynum. Jefferson would turn into an even bigger pussy against Artest and Kobe would slap Hill.
suns layin an egg
lakers were glad to see phoenix beat the spurs. spurs wouldnt have beat the lakers or anything but kobe and co. doesn't even look like they're trying out there. having way to much fun. suns are done.
Is this you????
Not even Matt Bonner would be as bad as Amar'e has been on defense.
Shame that Ginobili's nose broke.
I guarantee you the suns will get at least as many games as the spurs did against them.
Match up? Sure. But it'd be the lakers in 5 I think.
The Lakers still would have won but I would have preferred the Spurs. The suns are too soft, at this rate the Lakers will lose home court advantage against the Celtics. They'll be knocked around thinking they can go to the basket untouched, like they are against the suns.
Good point. The soft play Orlando faced has really hurt them in their preparation for Boston.The Lakers still would have won but I would have preferred the Spurs. The suns are too soft, at this rate the Lakers will lose home court advantage against the Celtics. They'll be knocked around thinking they can go to the basket untouched, like they are against the suns.
Exactly, by time Orlando adjusts, it will be too late. I can see the Lakers losing game 1 and home court will be very important in the finals.
Mavs would be a better matchup
Ginobili, and Parker would have been the x-factors in that series, along with Hill, and Blair. Duncan could only do so much because by the time they would have gotten to the WCF's...He would have been out of gas. Jefferson would just have been a total waste of time putting on the floor. Mason would have had more of an affect on this series if it would have ever happen against The Lakers!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
