Reply With Quote
Sons, them muslims like ghazi have a different definition of "innocent".
IF you're not a muslim, you're a target.
Taking innocent hostages in an American embassy isn't terrorism?
Sons, them muslims like ghazi have a different definition of "innocent".
IF you're not a muslim, you're a target.
The US became a world power because it was rich in natural resources and a combination of other things. Corruption doesn't ever lead to being a world power, corrupt governments generally control 3rd world countries.
Kill the infidels!
I ain't even Muslim.
I just like peace and harmony
Therefore, do not support the Zionists
I'm not saying playing Team America: World Police hasn't been of great benefit to the world many times, but the US has supported terrorists in the past, like Bin Laden which bit them in the ass big time. The US has used fear and intimidation to keep smaller countries in line and doing their bidding many times now. There was that with Noriega that looks like a pretty s my affair altogether now. And flying planes into buildings is pretty sick but child's play compared to dropping nuclear bombs on entire cities.
If you consider Africans a natural resource, then yes.
Maybe calling the US government the most evil government was a bit much.
I'll just say this - the US governent has obviously supported terrorism, performed terrorism, and done a load of other corrupt things, but in the end they usually do it for "the right reasons".
Islamic got terrorists do that too, but always for "the wrong reasons".
Yeah exactly, supporting terrorists got them nowhere. They basically created the Taliban, and in return the world trade centers were blown up. I'm not saying America is some perfect, flawless country, what I'm more saying is Ghazi acting like Iran is some peaceful, Utopian land is ludicrous. I know this because his family bolted that country.
it was justified. the only mistake the US ever made was letting our technology such as the A-bomb leak
looks pretty peaceful to me
great ing pictures
no it wasn't brah. all's fair in war but targeting civilians almost exclusively is for gots.
lolwut
What else was the US supposed to do? Invading Japan would have cost roughly 1,000,000 American lives (military experts have come up with those estimates). Dropping those bombs was a last resort.
So an entire city full of civilians needs to be vaporized because the US doesn't want to go after the Jap military any more? Even in the case of Pearl Harbor, the Japs were still attacking a military base.
I know Hiroshima had some military significance but that still doesn't justify destroying an entire city full of civilians. And then doing it again to Nagasaki. That's terrorism at it's worst.
When going after the Jap military more than they already did would have required a full scale invasion that would have been 100x worse than Normandy beach, yeah, that was justified. Japan had been driven way back and lost all control of the Pacific. Their stubborn refusal to surrender left their citizens at risk. Even after Hiroshima was bombed, they refused to surrender so the innocent people in Nagasaki would die for no good reason. That's not the US's fault.
maybe so. I still think that when it's two military forces going at it, anything goes. The second civilians are targeted, it's terrorism.
And which would these be?
I understand you and your country love Hitler and view him as a hero, but the rest of the world is pretty happy the US shut his ass down.
lol at an argy coming in.
Sons, harboring nazis is worse than anything the U.S ever did.
lol harboring nazis.
While that's fair logic, Truman had to decide between a bunch of young American boys dying and a bunch of Japanese civilians dying. He offered Japan every chance to surrender but eventually did what would save the most American lives. The Japanese government cared more about calling America's bluff than protecting their citizens. Think about what it would have been like to explain to an ungodly number of mothers that their son died while invading Japan targeting their military so some Japanese piece of who didn't care about America wouldn't die. Don't blame America for those people dying, it was Japan's fault.
Eliminating nazism, what else? I'm just trying to get in which cir stances is OK to use terrorism and be corrupt like you said.
I'm not saying it's okay, I'm just saying the US generally does it because they're trying to backdoor sweep a nation they think is more evil than they are (like Cuba, the USSR, etc). That's for the "right reasons".
Not that it's right, or that their reasoning is even right, just that their motives aren't truly evil. Which is the exact opposite of Islamic got terrorists.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
true
