Hi,
few minutes ago on RMC-info (french radio), Ian said he was seeking a new
team for next year. He would not stay on the bench behind Tim, Blair, Bonner and Mc Dyess
Ian>Bonner.
I'm gonna be pissed if we re-sign Bonner. I really hope we re-sign Ian though, he has a lot of potential.
I kinda agree with Hooks, but it's not like it matters, he won't ever see the floor even if Bonner was gone.
More complete recap here:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...0&postcount=93
I think this is similar (if not the same) as the radio interview linked on the Ian thread in the Think Tank. I haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but Bruno had a nice summary.
Edit: Beaten to the punch again! I'm getting slow in my old age...![]()
It isn't the same interview (different radio). Ian will also be on a cable TV tomorrow. He said more things on the one I've summarized.
Ian's situation is very simple to summarize and understand: He would like to stay in SA but his priority is to get consistent playing time. If Spurs offers him a contract with the opportunity to play, he will stay. If Spurs don't want him back or want him at the deep end of the bench, he will try to find another team.
If he goes to another team and plays reasonably decent, I'll be very upset.
if he goes to a contender and plays well. I could easily see him going to the garbage teams like minnesota or sacramento and do alright. but thats not saying much.
I'd only want to resign him if it meant packaging him in some sort of sign and trade. On any other team, he might be a decent player if given the chance, but with S.A. he's a bust. Waste of an 05 pick.
Peace homie!
Yes, yes it is. If he proves to be a decent NBA player in a team other than the Spurs I'll be pissed.
This...![]()
why? he had plenty of chance here. Same as Beno, I was not pissed he did ok in Sacto
WTF? when?
see 2007-2010
Yeeees????? so? I don't know if he acomulates more than three full games worth of PT during those years.
It's a shame. If Splitter comes I don't see Mahinmi back. McDyess coming to SA hurt Mahinmi this year as far as getting playing time.
we need Ian back, he's the only guy we have with a chance to be a defensive presence around the rim. we need someone to turn away those slashing guards
ian is too young to let go....when we are trying to get younger players on the team, it is really absurd to let ian sign with another team....he is young and can easily play backup to timmy like gortat backs up dwight except gortat is much better defender than ian....imo we should resign ian and let bonner walk....
when our main focal point is defense there is no point in resigning bonner and mason coz either cant play defense....we should resign ian as a backup....coz if he goes to another team am sure he will play well.....we have seen scola do that ...we dont wanna see ian do that when we have a chance to resign him...
I can appreciate that concern man, but IMO, Scola > Mahinmi.
To compare the 2 is unjustified. Scola was already making some serious noise overseas before he came to the NBA. Ian was just a young raw skilled ball player. I just think he would've done something to convince the FO and coaching staff by now for him to have received more PT.
I guess we'll have to wait and see, but I think the only way he gets resigned is if he's included in a deal of some sort.
Why is it so hard for people to understand that a young player need to EARN playing time in practice.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)