who invited this guy?![]()
this!!!!
who invited this guy?![]()
... wow some folks are just stupid and should be banned for such stupid ideas.
If you really want to give us TD for bynum i beg you to kindapp your GM and make the trade happen and us lakers will laugh at you.
Damn,
This is so fail. I don't even know where to begin.![]()
You asked the wrong question. The question should be "Why not start construction on the Tim Duncan statue to put outside the ATT Center"
A young talented team could be.
Don't you believe Duncan playing for Oklahoma City or Portland could have been a huge difference?
I hope this is a joke.
This post = instant headache.
Leaving aside all Duncan has done for the team and the respect he deserves, look at the practical applications. There is no way a team will take on his contract with his playing problems in the post-season and give us the value back. We'd be taking on several sub-par players (and if you think Duncan is declining and sub-par, I'm not certain how replacing him with multiple sub-par players helps the situation) or a bloated contract.
I really don't see the point.
Experience wise there's no question. However......knowing what you know about Duncan's past 3 years:
Does OKC or POR take Duncans 22 mil per? Because that's the other part of this equation. Also, who do they lose to take that contract on? There's a reason those teams strive to stay around the 50-60 million mark in salary. Presti has done a masterful job thus far, but the piper is just around the corner so to speak.
You see, those are the questions that fans usually don't entertain. Basketball is a business. If you grasp that first, then most transactions that take place around the league will begin to make more sense (the Gasol deal nonwithstanding...)
Also, we were talking about sending Timmy to a team that's a contender NOW. Not in 3-4 years. i.e Cleveand, Boston, Orlando, LA, etc.
again to the point of why I asked who he would trade timmy for...I for one agree with the person who stated when will we build the statue of timmy, i'd throw in ice and david with a small statue of silas as he was my first original favorite spur....
what if Blair and his knees explode more the Greg Oden?
It's always a possibility, that's the scary thing. His value right now could be pretty high. If the spurs were to make some big trade this off-season or something he could be a nice piece to add to get some quality guys in return. It's just hard to see him having a long NBA career. I love the kid though.
Some of you people need to be Godfathered Vito Corleone style for stupidity. Quack, wiseguy, and Not So fab...y'all need horse heads in your bed.
Pop has been Vice-President of Basketball Operations since 1994 Fabbs. Learn something before you say something.
PopApologist,
He was promoted to President in 2008.
Learn something before you say something?
Sigh...... Okay, let's look at the last time we traded an icon and how well that worked. George Gervin was traded to Chicago for F David Greenwood in 1985. It was 5 years before the team had a winning record again.
I would rather try the transition theory than the blow it up theory, which has never worked for a quick turn around. Ask Chicago and Boston if you need further proof.
I'll be 1st to say I'm not a big Duncan fan, but its only a few people who just should never put on another jersey! Duncan being a main 1. Kobe is another, & how odd did Karl (house ) Malone looked in a LA uniform!?! I said Duncan was soft but I wouldn't trade his ass. Duncan as a 3rd option is still good.
Even for the posters who think the good and success of the overall team should come ahead the individual(s), Duncs trade value seems much too low now to get a good return.
Something like Dunks for Durant will no way happen now. Presti when a Spurs is one who helped provide some of the players from which Popped was able to coatail.
you continue to amaze me with your stupidity.
Coming from you i'll take that as a compliment.
You'll be in attendance no doubt.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...ight=PollyAnna
IF you really knew anything about Spurs basketball, then you would know that Pop has had the same job since 1994. While the le has changed, it didn't change his job nor give him even more responsibilities.
I'm just trying to decode if you hate Pop more than Ducks hates Ginobili.
As of right now, it's pretty even.
How was he "promoted" yet stayed the same?
PT Barnum Promotions?
http://www.nba.com/spurs/news/office...nt_080715.html
"Gregg Popovich has been promoted to president of Spurs basketball as well as continuing as the team’s head coach."
Decoder: Do you love losing seasons more then Michael Finley? Matt Bonner?
Mostly I agree with you. Moreover I want Duncan to retire as a Spurs.
But, If you do something like Duncan for Camby/Oden/Webster... Portland could look like a contender right now.
Surely you are not oblivious to symbolic promotions in the world of business.
Pop isn't going to leave the team for a long time. Should find something else to hate, tbh. RC, Holt, they LOVE Pop. Why would they ever fire him? He'll retire as coach eventually but he'll still be there as president for many years.
I'm not a huge Spurs fan (I am a fan though because they are my cousins favorite team and because I spend some time every year in Laredo and go to a game or two) but I sure as never want to see Duncan in any uniform other than a Spurs uni.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)