Just messing with Mongro and his "holier than thou" art ude. He thinks because he goes to workshops that he actually knows the game.
What does different musculature have to do with "evolutionization" or "morphing"?Physiologically speaking, athletes of that era were different. You didn't have Shaq's or Dwight Howards or Michael Jordan "built" players back then is what I am trying to convey to you. I am don't understand why you can't grasp that.
Forget it. It's not your fault.
The point was made clearly but I guess some can and some cannot digest simple logical points.
No clue who that is or what the relevance is to the thread...
But that makes it all the funnier.
Like I said before, give me a good reaction gif anyday.
Hmm.
Players looking completely different than they did back then would seem to be the very definition of evolving and morphing, not to mention being able to leap higher, dunking the ball, ambidexterity, greater strength, etc.
What is open to debate is whether this makes today's players and game better, but to pretend there hasn't been evolution among players seems silly to me.
Do you know what the word "evolution" (never mind "evolutionizing") means?
Being that I was using it in context with the development of players from one era to another, it's pretty simple to ascertain what I was trying to convey. Several people with deep interest and knowledge of the game concur with what I've typed and for lack of a better term and to assist you..."Get it".
Again. I understand. It's not your fault.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
