Reply With Quote
Do I feel like my visiting family?
When you go to the zoo do you feel like your visiting family?
Do I feel like my visiting family?
You would think a visit to the Zoo would change all that.....
lol grammar smack
That looks like a load of sentence fragments to me.
1. Humans Evolved From Monkeys
Humans and great apes had a common ancestor about 5 million years ago Humans and monkeys had a common ancestor about 50 million years ago.
Nowhere, except in the most illiterate anti-evolution literature, will you find a claim that humans evolved from monkeys.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/li...faq/cat02.html
I did that for emphasis, obviously.
Mouse, however, made the all too common mistake of confusing "you're" with "your."
Hey, asshole, are you saying this cause redzero is black?
quantum theory doesnt account for time and space. it merely implies that its a phenomena that results from the interactions between strings in calabi-yau space. it predicts several things, but assumes many more. imo, whatever created time as a substance does not have a "before."
My issues have less to do with the theories of creation than the people promoting those theories. Too much arrogance and not enough listening to what the other party has to say.
I am not even sure 'Steady Staters' and 'Big Bangers' are even discussing the same thing most of the time.
Lets say that there was a big bang from a single point. That doesn't change the fact that that point was there first. Lets say that the big bang is a cyclical event, alternating big bangs and big crunches, that still doesn't contradict, essentially, what the steady starers say about how the universe always was.
Neither argument seems to say anything different: The universe always was, in some form or another.
Conceptually, this is hard to grasp, and leaves open the possibility that at some point there actually was an initial creation. But Big Bangers don't really address that, at least not on the programs/textbooks I have seen.
doesn't change the fact that grammar smack is for cheese s.
When something explodes all particles rotate in the same direction. Jupiter has moons that rotate in the opposite direction as Jupiter and it's other moons how do you explain that?
looks like your big bang theory is really a big dud.
The Big Bang wasn't an explosion; it was a rapid expansion.
Jupiter and its moons weren't formed at the time of the Big Bang. They formed billions of years later.Jupiter has moons that rotate in the opposite direction as Jupiter and it's other moons how do you explain that?
Looks like all you do is spew bull you heard from somebody else.looks like your big bang theory is really a big dud.
then why not call it the big expansion?
And you have the proof?Jupiter and its moons weren't formed at the time of the Big Bang. They formed billions of years later.
So all your bull is your own research?Looks like all you do is spew bull you heard from somebody else.
Atheists don't have a book to tell them what to think and how to behave.If you think this exact statement doesn't apply to a great deal of atheists as well, you're fooling yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_HoyleFred Hoyle is credited with coining the term Big Bang during a 1949 radio broadcast. It is popularly reported that Hoyle, who favored an alternative "steady state" cosmological model, intended this to be pejorative, but Hoyle explicitly denied this and said it was just a striking image meant to highlight the difference between the two models.
And you have the proof?http://www.universetoday.com/guide-t...on-of-jupiter/Just like the rest of the gas giants in the Solar System, the formation of Jupiter began with the build up of ice covered dust in the outer, cold solar nebula. Small particles of ice and dust came together, forming larger and larger objects. When the nascent planet had gathered together enough mass, its gravity attracted more dust, as well as hydrogen and helium. The heaviest elements sunk into the core of the planet, surrounded by the lighter hydrogen and helium in its atmosphere.
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast121/lectures/lec19.htmlJupiter's Formation:
The formation of Jupiter (and the other Jovian worlds) starts with the accretion (build-up) of ice-covered dust in the outer, cold solar nebula
Note that, due to gravity, the heavier elements sink to the core of proto-Jupiter, thus, we expect the core region to be rocky. While the lighter elements (H and He) remain in the atmosphere.
Nowhere in the Big Bang Theory is it claimed that all the planets instantaneously formed, as you falsely presume.
Facts and common knowledge are not bull . If you actually spent time looking these things up or paying attention in class, you might actually learn something.So all your bull is your own research?
Religious people have a missconception about atheists, "Atheist" is just a word to describe a person that doesn't bealive in a God, it's not a religion, it's not a cult, it's nothing more than a noun. Two atheists can have nothing in common other than the fact that they don't bealive in God.
For example I'm an atheist and you won't see me defending the Big Bang theory.
You don't even have to defend the Big Bang theory. Even if it was wrong, that still doesn't prove that there is a God--because it's impossible to prove.
/threadHoyle was a writer of science fiction,
Last edited by mouse; 06-06-2010 at 04:34 PM.
1.) Horrible attempt at ad hominem.
2.) Fred Hoyle did not accept the Big Bang Theory, you moron.
in particular his rejection of the "Big Bang" theory, a term originally coined by him as a jocular, perhaps disparaging, name for the theory which was the main rival to his own.
Pathetic attempt at a comeback. I just showed you how your "proof" is false, and your retort is this?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...543258-3148738
Just out of curiosity,.....please don't use Google and stop posting cheesy drawings and links. I can post a page that shows a man with a beard creating the universe that doesn't mean it happened, you and no one you know was here when the earth was formed so just give it a rest for now and answer me this.
If comets are a result of the big bang or your "Expansion" theory then why are they still here shooting across space since they have a lifespan of only 10,000 years and they were created millions of years ago?
Your opinion not Google's please.
The drawing exists to illustrate a point. Period.
Oh, so explanations attained from logic, reasoning, and observation carry the same weight as some moron's claim that a bearded man created the universe? Okay.I can post a page that shows a man with a beard creating the universe that doesn't mean it happened,
I wasn't here when Alexander the Great was alive, conquering large portions of the earth. I wasn't around when the Ice Age happened. I wasn't around when dinosaurs roamed the earth, when neanderthals lived, or when WWII happened. Does that changed the fact that those things still happened and that there are logical explanations for them happening?you and no one you know was here when the earth was formed so just give it a rest for now and answer me this.
Again, you are not listening. Comets formed over millions of years. Planets formed over millions of years. They did not come into being when the Big Bang occurred.If comets are a result of the big bang or your "Expansion" theory
More comets formed, obviously.then why are they still here shooting across space since they have a lifespan of only 10,000 years and they were created millions of years ago?
Oh, you don't like the facts I showed you? You would rather have me spew uninformed bull like you do?Your opinion not Google's please.
Now, I gave you my opinion. If you really want to know how comets are formed, look it up.
I want to know where redzero's sig is from?
Unfortunately no one can be told what Jersey Shore is. You have to see it for yourself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
