Turkey has announced they will send another flotilla to Gaza escorted by Turk Navy

[ElNono]

I think opinion varies on this. You can say it's illegal all you want and I can find numerous maritime attorneys that say it is legal.

Link? None you provided so far supports that point.

[ElNono]

No I didn't. I said something about it before.

What you 'think' is irrelevant. Your San Remo manual has been demonstrated to be entirely irrelevant in this case. You need to reach for another manual.

Sometimes things are in conflict.

There's no conflict here. You can proceed respecting the law or you don't.

[Mavs_man_41]

Did commandos with guns drop from helicopters this time?

you are such a troll why do you even waste your own time?

[ChumpDumper]

you are such a troll why do you even waste your own time?

Why do you waste your time reading and responding?

I was actually serious. Were commandos with guns dropping onto the boat this time?

[Shastafarian]

Why do you waste your time reading and responding?

I was actually serious. Were commandos with guns dropping onto the boat this time?

Why do you ask questions to which you already know the answer?

[ChumpDumper]

Why do you ask questions to which you already know the answer?

I don't know the answer to this question. I thought someone who knew could tell me quickly. Is it in the rest of the article you posted?

[Shastafarian]

I don't know the answer to this question. I thought someone who knew could tell me quickly. Is it in the rest of the article Darrin posted?

It's in the rest of the article I posted. There's an embedded video.

[ChumpDumper]

It's in the rest of the article I posted. There's an embedded video.

So you couldn't just tell me?

[Shastafarian]

So you couldn't just tell me?

Why would I do that when you can see it for yourself?

[ChumpDumper]

Why would I do that when you can see it for yourself?

Save yourself several stupid posts.

So, since Shastafarian was afraid to just say it for some reason, there were no commandos with guns dropping from helicopters this time.

[Shastafarian]

Save yourself several stupid posts.

So, since Shastafarian was afraid to just say it for some reason, there were no commandos with guns dropping from helicopters this time.

How was I afraid to say it? I posted the article. If you're too lazy or disinterested to actually read about what we're discussing, that's not my problem.

[Shastafarian]

Why do you waste your time reading and responding?

I was actually serious. Were commandos with guns dropping onto the boat this time?

So when you're serious about knowing something you want us to spoon feed you what you want? I guess from now on we should just copy and paste entire articles and embed any videos found within. That would save you the hassle of actually having to do something on your own.

[ChumpDumper]

How was I afraid to say it? I posted the article. If you're too lazy or disinterested to actually read about what we're discussing, that's not my problem.

I asked a simple question to which you knew the answer and refused to divulge out of some weird fear that it undermines your pro-Israel stance. If you are too afraid to answer my question, don't get all pissy about it and whine about my asking questions. If it's not your problem, don't whine about it.

Good move by Israel not dropping commandos with guns on this ship.

[ChumpDumper]

So when you're serious about knowing something you want us to spoon feed you what you want? I guess from now on we should just copy and paste entire articles and embed any videos found within. That would save you the hassle of actually having to do something on your own.

You could just answer the question with a simple yes or no and not make yourself look like an infant whining about my question post after post.

[Shastafarian]

I asked a simple question to which you knew the answer and refused to divulge out of some weird fear that it undermines your pro-Israel stance.

I "refused" to answer it because clearly you hadn't read the article. I wanted to help you out. You chose ad-hominem instead. Can't say I'm surprised. I guess disappointed would be a better word to describe it.

If you are too afraid to answer my question, don't get all pissy about it and whine about my asking questions. If it's not your problem, don't whine about it.

Wasn't whining. I just had a feeling you hadn't read what you were commenting on. I was right.

Good move by Israel not dropping commandos with guns on this ship.

Good move by the ship's captain telling the people on board to sit and not resist.

[Shastafarian]

You could just answer the question with a simple yes or no and not make yourself look like an infant whining about my question post after post.

I answered it by steering you to the article everyone else was discussing. You know, the article you didn't read. It's funny how you always blast WC and others for not reading they comment on. They deserve it no doubt. But then you go an turn into them. A shame really.

[ChumpDumper]

I "refused" to answer it because clearly you hadn't read the article. I wanted to help you out. You chose ad-hominem instead. Can't say I'm surprised. I guess disappointed would be a better word to describe it.

Whining.

Wasn't whining. I just had a feeling you hadn't read what you were commenting on. I was right.

Whining.

Good move by the ship's captain telling the people on board to sit and not resist.

Agreed.

Do you think Israel's not dropping commandos with guns from helicopters was also a good move? That wasn't in the article you posted.

[Shastafarian]

Whining.


Whining.

I guess you don't like it when people call you on not reading articles huh?

Agreed.

Do you think Israel's not dropping commandos with guns from helicopters was also a good move? That wasn't in the article you posted.

Did you finally read the article?

[ChumpDumper]

I answered it by steering you to the article everyone else was discussing. You know, the article you didn't read. It's funny how you always blast WC and others for not reading they comment on. They deserve it no doubt. But then you go an turn into them. A shame really.

I wasn't commenting on it. I was asking a question about it. After the question was answered, then I commented on it.

Now you are simply lying about what I did.

A shame really.

[Shastafarian]

I wasn't commenting on it. I was asking a question about it. After the question was answered, then I commented on it.

Now you are simply lying about what I did.

A shame really.

So instead of reading the article you had questions about, you ask us. Glad we clarified that.

[ChumpDumper]

I guess you don't like it when people call you on not reading articles huh?

A yes or no would have done fine. You were just pissy about actually answering because you think it somehow makes the raid look bad. I can't blame you. People like WC and yoni stonewall all the time when they are faced with making a concession.

Did you finally read the article?

Stonewalling.

[ChumpDumper]

So instead of reading the article you had questions about, you ask us. Glad we clarified that.

You knew, didn't you? Had I known you would be so pissy and evasive, I certainly wouldn't have bothered asking. Most of the time, folks are rather forthcoming with simple facts. From now on, you can assume I am not asking you for any simple facts, because I know it upsets you so.

[Shastafarian]

A yes or no would have done fine. You were just pissy about actually answering because you think it somehow makes the raid look bad.

Nope. I don't think it makes that much of a difference whether soldiers repel down from a helicopter versus soldiers boarding from a ship. Oh shoot I ruined the ending for you!

I can't blame you. People like WC and yoni stonewall all the time when they are faced with making a concession.

So your theory is what exactly? I hoped no one would click on the link and see for themselves what happened with the Rachel Corrie? I mean, I guess that's an ok theory for people who don't click the link and actually read the article.

Stonewalling.

Is that a no? Watch the video embedded in the article and then we'll discuss it.

[Shastafarian]

You knew, didn't you? Had I known you would be so pissy and evasive, I certainly wouldn't have bothered asking. Most of the time, folks are rather forthcoming with simple facts. From now on, you can assume I am not asking you for any simple facts, because I know it upsets you so.

My biggest mistake was thinking for a second you already knew the answer to your question and were trying to troll DarrinS. If I had given you a simple "yes" or "no" you'd never read articles for yourself. What kind of friend would I be if I didn't help you?

[ChumpDumper]

Nope. I don't think it makes that much of a difference whether soldiers repel down from a helicopter versus soldiers boarding from a ship. Oh shoot I ruined the ending for you!

I do think it makes a significant difference. You are free to disagree.

So your theory is what exactly? I hoped no one would click on the link and see for themselves what happened with the Rachel Corrie? I mean, I guess that's an ok theory for people who don't click the link and actually read the article.

My "theory" is you can't expect everyone to read every linked article completely and watch every video. You assumed I already had -- or you didn't. Whatever the case, you certainly seem to relish the opportunity to be pissy about it.

Is that a no? Watch the video embedded in the article and then we'll discuss it.

Read the article. Watched the video. It basically did the same thing you could have answered with one word. Thanks for letting us all know just how much your butt hurts because I didn't click a link.