That's Phil's calling card though, early to the table before any evidence exists. Rivers, on the other hand, has got the goods on Phil's boys in his "voyeurcam".
Doc is just butthurt. the only way the Celtics have a chance in this series is if they are physical. no clue why he's trying to make the game less physical and less to his team's advantage.
the guy he should be sending videotape to is Ray Allen. he needs to send him one of those basketball shooting drills videos.
I'm surprised the league doesn't decree a gag order on game officials forbiding them from Media during the playoffs (like a jury). The absence of such a decree lends credence that the league is framing the officiating based on pressure from the head coaching.
The threat of suspension hangs over Perkins like Damacle's sword. It's ruined his game. His game is one of intimidation thru body & facial language fortified thru physical punishment. He's impotent, like somebody with ED. (tee, hee).
Wow.... what a surprise. Harlem/Chris/Miami with another anti Laker post.
OBSESSED!
Yes i agree but 96-86 FTA's Attempted Lakers with 2 of those 3 games in LA that is NOT unusual ...
The reffing has been ty but NOT one-sided ...
+1. I noticed Bynum was moving on his screens ALOT last night...
true. i think it's ridiculous how they didn't give him a "T" i think it was in game 2, when he got into something with Gasol. they normally would have given him one.
for the record, i personally think that the league should change the way they officiate in terms of giving handing out technicals, so i don't disagree with it. i think they should've held out on giving him one. the problem is the inconsistency of they way the league office handles things. back in '07, when it was Spurs vs. Suns, the league office, by handing out the suspensions, seemed to establish the fact that they were going to abide by the letter of the law, not matter if it hurt one team's chance of winning the game, and for that matter the series. so they handed out the suspensions. obviously, it was a huge reason the Suns lost that series. NOW, they're managing things differently. now they're holding out on the T's they give players in the interest of a more compe ive series. it's bull . it allows one to assume that the league office is manipulating the series. bull . bull . bull . the NBA needs to get rid of Stern and replace him with someone who has honesty.
Hey he can whin if he wants ...but in a way to me he shows weakness the WAY he is doing it.
Phil doesnt it before the series and reminds the refs through the media as needed.
Doc is not new at this but he waits until the ish happens ...he started whining after Magic won back2vback games in the ECF as well ...when Dwight was bullying his so-called tough guys ....
Yes, Rivers looks amateurish flailing about like this.
Jackson looks dignified.
DESPERATE times call for ... LOL
im all for the refs looking for illegal screens. Thanks doc!
if you watch the games you will see this; if you are honest;
celtics get clobbered in the paint--no call
gasol and kobe get phantom call after phantom call---
fisher can mug anyone at any time and get away with it 5-6 times in a row...then they call a foul on fish---and he can't in believe it
artest can hold,grab, impede progress, swipe at balls , arms, slap--etc--and get away with it...
on & on & on
just watch the games---it is obvious if you can be honest
You are honestly an idiot.
Did doc send tape of him running on the court to call a timeout?
Does dignified stand for petty ?
Do 'im, DPG, and don't give Gui the courtesy of lube either!
Doc just needs to tell his players to get swole on them Lakers and bring down the hammer on those moving picks..
Oh the humanity of it all.
I'm pretty sure if Stern reviews the tapes of this series he will find more uncalled fouls against the Celtics than the Lakers. The Celtics defense is based on grabbing and holding and their offense revolves around moving screens.
Doc complaining about moving screens?
I don't mind this. He's doing his job. Lobbying the refs is looking for an edge. Anything he can do to help the team win. I don't have to like it... but again, don't really mind it either.
PJ does the exact same stuff all the time of course.
I will point out something: the C's were not called for a moving screen last night if he's referring to the offensive foul called on Perk for setting a high screen. (It is possible he's referring to a different play but I don't think so.) Perk got whistled for an illegal screen, not because he was moving, but because he had his legs out way wider than his shoulders.
NBA refs are instructed to call that and for good reason. Anybody here ever run into a picker at a pickup game who's doing those "squat screens"? o, Charlie Horse...
AFAIK refs in the NBA will let players get away with some movement setting screens but won't allow the legs out wide to displace/trip defenders.
Refs called it right. A case where the law cause injustice but they followed the law.
Can't blame the refs for that. (I know you weren't)
This will be changed in the offseason, you watch.
Little by little, we'll be seeing more application of replay... in five years there will be a great deal more use. Get ready for longer games but that's the trade off for accuracy.
So at the NBA Headquarters, where the walls are covered with K. Bryant posters, and the floors are covered with purple and gold carpet, they're all going to sit back and watch this tape as they sip purple tails with gold umbrellas.
Can't wait to see the shift in the Earth's core this viewing brings about.
Boston complaining about moving screens?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
