It's really unfair to even compare these shots because they're definitely two watershed moments in Spurs' history. Yes, the 99 team was stacked, but as ShoogarBear pointed out, the knock on the Spurs before that first le was that they were weak and soft and would eventually fold ingloriously under pressure. What's to say that Portland, mental issues and all, doesn't feed off the second-guessing the media was sure to engage in had SA lost game 2? Remember, that Portland team had just come off eliminating the defending conference champion Jazz in the semis--they had absolutely no reason to be intimidated by San Antonio.
The '05 Finals was a watershed moment of a different sort. Sure, the Spurs were good, but let's face it--they hadn't faced anyone of the Pistons' caliber in the Finals before, and without that game 5 win, I have a hard time believing they'd be mentally capable of pulling themselves up by their bootstraps in game 6 (remember this was essentially the same squad that laid an egg in the elimination game after the .4 shot the year before).

Reply With Quote
