Reply With Quote
chip brown had it wrong that Colorado wasn't going to the pAc 10 because of Baylor. Looks like he's just another orangebloods asshole.
the Big-10! Come to the Pac-10 Texas!
chip brown had it wrong that Colorado wasn't going to the pAc 10 because of Baylor. Looks like he's just another orangebloods asshole.
I guarandamntee you that if Aggie decides to go it alone, they will get the Arkansas treatment from Texas. Good luck trying to schedule any of the former Big 12 Texas teams. It's just Stallings trying to prove he has a swinging that's bigger than Goodhairs.
I'm hearing that Oklahoma is commited to come to the Pac-10. I think Texas will come too.
Lol why are you so mad? According to Texas fans the rivalry with A&M doesn't even exist anymore and OU is all they care about, still Texas and their fans are getting all riled up and threatening not to play A&M because they don't want to join the likes of California-Berkeley and Washington.
We already know Texas is scared to join the SEC because of compe ion but why not schedule A&M anymore.... The same reason? or because A&M isn't bowing down to them like the rest of the conference? Either way, Texas is the ones acting foolishly. A&M is willing to play the SEC schedule and play Texas out of conference every year too keep the rivalry alive and the 2 schools happy.
Texas doesn't need A&M... everyone knows this but if you think A&M needs Texas you are very mistaken. A&M will decide what's best for their future on their own without being told what to do. If they feel pac10 is best then they will do it but not because Texas is telling them to unlike every other team in the conference.
Last edited by DesignatedT; 06-11-2010 at 05:09 PM.
Ed Clements on KLBJ says UT, Tech, OU and OK State are committed to PAC10 with all the Boards of Regents meeting next week. A&M still working on SEC.
Last time I checked, UT is located in the STATE of TEXAS, got!
Do you dream of Larry Coker while you touch yourself at night?
No one is mad. Texas will not give Aggie a game. It's as simple as that. Why reward a whiny who wants to feel important. That being said, I'm sure Aggie runs toward the west with their swords tucked between their legs. Andat Texas being scared of compe ion. Keep repeating it though.
I think A&M will come to the Pac-10 too. I can't wait for this to happen! It's going to be epic!
KLBJ says A&M is on the fence. It's all on the newscast now, so the big move almost has to be well-sourced and verified.
It wouldn't make any sense for you to come back with a logical opinion
Supposedly it's a done deal. A&M is the only team not to commit. If they do by Tuesday, it's theirs, if they don't, it's probably Utah or Kansas who gets the invite.
You're silly brah. The Big 10 was never an option for UT.
For UT it was keep the big 12 alive and still dominate so it can get its own network. If the dominoes fell and the b12 fell apart, then it was pac-10.
Big 10 was totally laughed at and scoffed by UT officials. They had no desire to be the sole southern member of an overrated conference that had to put its TEXAS boys in unfamiliar weather for every home game.
The upside (and dollars) for joining Pac10 are way better for UT than them joining the Big 10.
I like this. Sounds more & more like A&M might go to the sec. And how is A&M being a whiny ? And why are so many non-a&m fans upset? Just like t.u., A&M will do what's best for their university. Simple.
Why is it best for A&M?
The only reason A&M would go to SEC is because the guys making decisions have all agreed that the only hope they have to be a top dog in the state is by doing something that will differentiate them from UT. By going to the pac10 they keep the status quo essentially. They see a glimmer of hope in the SEC.
I like the recruiting argument, I think 16 is too big for a conference &, while I haven't done math, its seemingly less travel.
A&M is really going to make inroads into Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee and Louisiana now? I guess there is a better chance of a cracker factor working in A&M's favor in the south than in the west.[quote]I think 16 is too big for a conference[quote]13 is good though? What if they expand further?No doubt. The time zone argument is probably the best one to use if you're going to pretend to care about the student aspect of student athletics.&, while I haven't done math, its seemingly less travel.
Best of luck to you and whichever school you choose to support for whatever reason.
Never an option???
You mean if some came to you and offered you way more money you wouldn't even listen. Sounds like someone has positioned themselves to close to Chip Brown's .
UT only wanted the Big 12 around because it had the most control and had the possibility of starting up its own network. If you think UT wanted the Big 12 to stick together for any other reason you definitely rode the short bus as a child.
That is laughable. Is Texas scared of a little cold weather, from your perspective it sounds like are. The average temperature in November in Ohio is in the upper 40s, not bad at all. Besides UT had to play in Ames, Lincoln, Manhattan, Columbia, Boulder which all can have cold days.
What is laughable is that pidly ole Northwestern makes double in TV revenue than what the largest revenue producing school in the country does.
Yeah because that Pac-10 network in the worst time zone is in exactly how many households?
I wish UT the best. I would have liked them in the Big 10 but I understand why they would go to the Pac-10 as well. Maybe we will see them in the Rose Bowl sometime soon, if it still exists (of course it will).
I still have no idea what you're babbling about. Go yourself.
The notion that the Big 10 was scoffed by Texas is ing re ed. I'm sure they gave it a long, hard look. Much like the DJohn sucks every night before hitting the sack.
damn im gonna miss the big 12. short lived conference
Not true. He was actually the first to report that Colorado would be getting the invite over Baylor, but that baylor was trying to steal it away. They obviously failed and Colorado got the bid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
